In “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific,” Friedrich Engels’s ([1880] 2003: 126) critique of the utopian socialists Henri de Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, and Robert Owen is scathing. They have created “a mish-mash of such critical statements, economic theories, pictures of future society by the founders of different sects, as excite a minimum of opposition.” Yet he and Karl Marx also claim in “The Communist Manifesto” that utopian socialist writings “attack every principle of existing society. Hence, they are full of the most valuable materials for the enlightenment of the working class” (Marx and Engels [1848] 1978: 498). In his 1892 preface to the English edition of “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific,” Engels ([1880/1892] 2003) offers a possible explanation for this apparent tension. There, he traces the longer history of utopian socialism to the radical writings on reason and freedom by French and German Enlightenment philosophers Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Johann Gottlieb Fichte,...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
March 01 2025
Utopias: Impossible, Practical, Radical: Closing Available to Purchase
Nancy S. Love
Nancy S. Love is professor of political science in the Department of Government and Justice Studies at Appalachian State University. Her area of expertise is political theory, especially critical theory, democratic theory, and feminist theory. She has written multiple books on music and politics, most recently Anthems: Community, Land, and Song (forthcoming).
Search for other works by this author on:
New Political Science (2025) 47 (1): 195–199.
Citation
Nancy S. Love; Utopias: Impossible, Practical, Radical: Closing. New Political Science 1 March 2025; 47 (1): 195–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/07393148-11699685
Download citation file:
Advertisement
82
Views