Be it the top-down secularism of the Kemalist reforms or the authoritarian conservatism of the present Islamist government, the political will in Turkey has persistently ignored the individual, the most valuable component of democratic modernity. The Turkish bildungsroman voices the confusion that spreads from this contradiction. Being doomed to a state of eternal puberty, the novelistic hero cannot go out into the world and take his place in the history of civilization/culture (Bildung). This is especially true for the female Bildungsheld, who finds it even harder to find a spot in the public sphere, which in the Turkish case has come to imply a realm that belongs to the state or its institutions (kamu), a strictly masculine space. Not being able to manifest herself within social structures, she fails to take part in the network of actual give-and-take that defines all exchanges in the symbolical realm. Focusing on the femininity of the “eternally ill” “Beautiful Soul” (in Goethe's Wilhelm Meister) and the social masculinism of the bildungsroman, this essay refers to the elaboration of the same theme by Hegel and Lacan and traces variations of this neurotic character in the Turkish novel.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| May 01 2014
Hermits, Stoics, and Hysterics: Turkish Democracy and the Female Bildungsroman
Novel (2014) 47 (1): 90–107.
Meltem Gürle; Hermits, Stoics, and Hysterics: Turkish Democracy and the Female Bildungsroman. Novel 1 May 2014; 47 (1): 90–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-2414084
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In