World literature can be seen as one of Friedrich Nietzsche’s “good things,” a great idealization of the capacities of the human spirit and at the same time a fierce contest for power and dominance. In this contest the question of minor literature invariably surfaces in relation to issues of canonicity and to world literature in general. References to Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s work on Franz Kafka inevitably misread its revolutionary potential and become reductive. In the different European literatures, issues stemming from the aftermath of colonialism reveal the bankruptcy of the category of minor literature when one thinks about world literature. Several examples from lusophone writers and others point to the need to rethink the national categorization of literature. Instead of seeing some literatures as minor, Medeiros proposes seeing them as “eccentric,” questioning the division between center and periphery.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 1, 2013
Issue Editors
Research Article|
June 01 2013
Blindness, Invisibility, and the Negative Inheritance of World Literature
Modern Language Quarterly (2013) 74 (2): 277–292.
Citation
Paulo de Medeiros; Blindness, Invisibility, and the Negative Inheritance of World Literature. Modern Language Quarterly 1 June 2013; 74 (2): 277–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-2073025
Download citation file:
Advertisement