Building on the work of Prasenjit Duara, Vincent Goossaert, and Talal Asad, among others, Rebecca Nedostup's Superstitious Regimes offers a penetrating analysis of the complex confrontation between the Chinese Nationalist regime and the many faces of Chinese religion, largely during the Nanjing Decade. Her major theme is secularization, which Nationalist leaders saw as a necessary element of modern state building; traditional Chinese religion—much of which was relabelled as “superstition”—was viewed as an obstacle to mobilization and state penetration of society, as well as an international embarrassment. As part of the constitutional framework of modernity, freedom of religion was to be accorded to those religions who recast themselves along Western, generally Protestant lines, but the rights of most religious practitioners were not at the forefront of Nationalist concerns. While Islam, Tibetan and Mongolian Buddhism, and Christianity were largely left alone for geopolitical and diplomatic reasons, Buddhism, Daoism, redemptive societies. and local...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
May 01 2011
Superstitious Regimes: Religion and the Politics of Chinese Modernity
Superstitious Regimes: Religion and the Politics of Chinese Modernity
. By Rebecca Nedostup. Cambridge, MA
: Harvard University Asia Center
, 2010
. xiv, 459 pp. $45.00 (cloth).
David Ownby
David Ownby
Université de Montréal
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of Asian Studies (2011) 70 (2): 539–541.
Citation
David Ownby; Superstitious Regimes: Religion and the Politics of Chinese Modernity. Journal of Asian Studies 1 May 2011; 70 (2): 539–541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911811000325
Download citation file:
Advertisement
30
Views