This article analyzes the ability of archival resources to make the especially transient and unstable performances of early modern mountebanks accessible and meaningful for performance studies research. Because mountebanks were itinerant performers and medical practitioners whose multiple roles challenged regulatory authorities and generated few lasting records, this article argues that mountebank performances may be best recovered and accessed by approaching the available archival materials not as records of fact, but of function. Documents like handbills associated with mountebanks were, after all, functional, inviting their readers to witness performances and test medical services. Self-authored documents like bills as well as representational and fictional texts replicate and reenact performative strategies attributed to mountebanks, namely, the cultivation of ambivalent rhetoric and compulsion to independent judgment of truth.
Skip Nav Destination
September 1, 2021
Ineke Murakami Donovan Sherman
Research Article| September 01 2021
“Printed follyes”: Mountebanks and the Performance of Ambivalence within the Archive
Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (2021) 51 (3): 509–531.
Sarah Mayo; “Printed follyes”: Mountebanks and the Performance of Ambivalence within the Archive. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 1 September 2021; 51 (3): 509–531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-9295051
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In