Both premodern Christians and modern scholars have described the difference between Catholic and Protestant penance in terms of cause and sign: roughly, Catholics thought that repentance was both a cause and sign of grace, whereas Protestants thought it was only a sign. Yet when we examine the details of this debate the matter becomes ambiguous, with repentance and grace causally entangling each other like the chicken and the egg. An examination of the repentance of Robert the Robber (in Langland) and King Claudius (in Shakespeare) suggests that a better way to distinguish the two scenarios as characteristically Catholic and Protestant involves a speech-act analysis, which replaces notions of cause and effect with notions of the direction of illocutionary force. This approach allows us to acknowledge the important differences between Catholic and Protestant penitential understandings without denying the degree to which cause and sign slide into each other.
Skip Nav Destination
September 1, 2018
David Aers Sarah Beckwith
Research Article| September 01 2018
Claudius and the Robber Apologize: The Variety of Speech Act in Protestant and Catholic Repentance
Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (2018) 48 (3): 461–489.
Andrew Escobedo; Claudius and the Robber Apologize: The Variety of Speech Act in Protestant and Catholic Repentance. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 1 September 2018; 48 (3): 461–489. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-7048559
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In