1-16 of 16 Search Results for

pegram

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
×Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 August 2001) 26 (4): 767–788.
Published: 01 August 2001
...Peter J. Hammer Managed care presents the paradox of organizations having real power over people's lives without there being clear or consistent means of ensuring accountability. In Pegram v. Herdrich , the United States Supreme Court struggled with whether “fiduciary duties” under the federal...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 August 2001) 26 (4): 675–678.
Published: 01 August 2001
.... In a manner of speaking, that is the subject of Peter J. Hammer’s report from the field, “Pegram v. Herdrich: On Peritonitis, Preemption, and the Elusive Goal of Managed Care Accountability.” In the Pegram case, the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 December 2004) 29 (6): 1227–1234.
Published: 01 December 2004
...-patient rela- tionship, limitations on patient choice, arbitrary denials of care, and trust- eroding institutional arrangements rife with conflicts of interest—can be solved, he says, by resurrecting the fiduciary duty concept rejected by the Supreme Court in Pegram v. Herdrich (530 U.S. 211 [2000...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 December 2004) 29 (6): 1235–1238.
Published: 01 December 2004
...-patient rela- tionship, limitations on patient choice, arbitrary denials of care, and trust- eroding institutional arrangements rife with conflicts of interest—can be solved, he says, by resurrecting the fiduciary duty concept rejected by the Supreme Court in Pegram v. Herdrich (530 U.S. 211 [2000...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 December 2004) 29 (6): 1238–1241.
Published: 01 December 2004
...-patient rela- tionship, limitations on patient choice, arbitrary denials of care, and trust- eroding institutional arrangements rife with conflicts of interest—can be solved, he says, by resurrecting the fiduciary duty concept rejected by the Supreme Court in Pegram v. Herdrich (530 U.S. 211 [2000...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 December 2004) 29 (6): 1241–1248.
Published: 01 December 2004
... resurrecting the fiduciary duty concept rejected by the Supreme Court in Pegram v. Herdrich (530 U.S. 211 [2000 Strangers begins and ends with stirring admonitions to physicians and attorneys to put differences aside and work toward the construction of medically responsive and fiscally sound health care...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 April 2001) 26 (2): 429–438.
Published: 01 April 2001
... third area in which ambivalence about CEA can be seen is the liti- JHPPL 26.2-12 Mello 3/22/01 12:18 PM Page 436 436 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law gation in managed care cases. Pegram v. Herdrich (120 S. Ct. 2143 [2000 clearly states that...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 April 2001) 26 (2): 291–326.
Published: 01 April 2001
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 April 2001) 26 (2): 387–408.
Published: 01 April 2001
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 February 2003) 28 (1): 1–8.
Published: 01 February 2003
... full flower for another five years. The U.S. Supreme Court’s Pegram Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 28, No. 1, February 2003. Copyright © 2003 by Duke University Press. 2 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law v. Herdrich decision would be handed down seven years in the...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 August 2002) 27 (4): 575–604.
Published: 01 August 2002
.... Health Affairs 20 (3): 274 -286. Leibenluft, R. F. 2000 . Health Care Antitrust. Health Care Litigation: What You Need to Know after Pegram. New York: Practicing Law Institute. Levit, K., C. Cowan, H. Lazenby, A. Sensenig, P. McDonnell, J. Stiller, and A. Martin. 2000 . Health Spending in 1998...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 April 2001) 26 (2): 409–428.
Published: 01 April 2001
... David Souter points out in Pegram v. Herdrich (120 S Ct. 2143 [2000 a cost-conscious plan is more likely to witness ruptured appendixes from too few appendectomy surgeries, while an open-ended fee-for-service approach is more likely to see unnecessary appendectomies. Health...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 December 1999) 24 (6): 1275–1304.
Published: 01 December 1999
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 June 2002) 27 (3): 465–494.
Published: 01 June 2002
... and prisons. Indeed, the Supreme Court has signaled its belief that it is imprudent for the judiciary to engage in evaluations of the particular mechanisms employed by managed care organizations to reduce costs and ration care, which is an important part of quality monitoring. In Pegram v. Her...
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 October 2007) 32 (5): 785–818.
Published: 01 October 2007
Journal Article
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (1 June 2003) 28 (2-3): 245–270.
Published: 01 June 2003