... be considered. This article examines lessons for HIA in the United States from the related and relatively well-developed field of environmental impact assessment (EIA). We reviewed the EIA literature and conducted twenty phone interviews with EIA professionals. Successes of EIA cited by respondents included...

.... Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only a handful of new cases. If one must allocate limited HIV prevention resources, p24 screening...

.... Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only a handful of new cases. If one must allocate limited HIV prevention resources, p24 screening...

.... Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only a handful of new cases. If one must allocate limited HIV prevention resources, p24 screening...

... antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only...

... antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only...

... groups. For example, p24 antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even...

... antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only...

... groups. For example, p24 antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even...

... antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only...

... antigen assay screening of donated blood is estimated to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only...

... to cost $7.5 million per averted infection. Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only a handful of new cases. If one must allocate...

.... Although p24 screen- ing is more sensitive and specific than the standard EIA method in detecting newly infected blood, HIV incidence among blood donors is so low that even a perfect test would detect only a handful of new cases. If one must allocate limited HIV prevention resources, p24 screening...