Skip to Main Content
Umbrella Alt Text
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Industry-Funded Research and Conflict of Interest: An Analysis of Research Sponsored by the Tobacco Industry Through the Center for Indoor Air Research

J Health Polit Policy Law (1996) 21 (3): 515–542.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Analysis of mainstream emissions, secondhand emissions and the environmental impact of IQOS waste: a systematic review on IQOS that accounts for data source
  • Malak El-Kaassamani
  • Miaoshan Yen
  • Soha Talih
  • Ahmad El-Hellani
Tobacco Control (2024) 33 (1): 93.
Alcohol, cardiovascular disease and industry funding: A co-authorship network analysis of epidemiological studies
  • Jim McCambridge
  • Su Golder
Addictive Behaviors (2024) 151: 107932.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration — a Korean translation
  • Jan P. Vandenbroucke
  • Erik von Elm
  • Douglas G. Altman
  • Peter C. Gøtzsche
  • Cynthia D. Mulrow
  • Stuart J. Pocock
  • Charles Poole
  • James J. Schlesselman
  • Matthias Egger
The Ewha Medical Journal (2024) 47 (2)
Home sleep apnea tests: Conflicts of interest and funding
  • Tanya Chen
  • Melissa Lee
  • Evelyn Constantin
  • Joshua Gurberg
  • Lily HP. Nguyen
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (2024) 176: 111755.
A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement
  • Tracey J. Woodruff
  • Swati D. G. Rayasam
  • Daniel A. Axelrad
  • Patricia D. Koman
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Deborah H. Bennett
  • Linda S. Birnbaum
  • Phil Brown
  • Courtney C. Carignan
  • Courtney Cooper
  • Carl F. Cranor
  • Miriam L. Diamond
  • Shari Franjevic
  • Eve C. Gartner
  • Dale Hattis
  • Russ Hauser
  • Wendy Heiger-Bernays
  • Rashmi Joglekar
  • Juleen Lam
  • Jonathan I. Levy
  • Patrick M. MacRoy
  • Maricel V. Maffini
  • Emily C. Marquez
  • Rachel Morello-Frosch
  • Keeve E. Nachman
  • Greylin H. Nielsen
  • Catherine Oksas
  • Dimitri Panagopoulos Abrahamsson
  • Heather B. Patisaul
  • Sharyle Patton
  • Joshua F. Robinson
  • Kathryn M. Rodgers
  • Mark S. Rossi
  • Ruthann A. Rudel
  • Jennifer B. Sass
  • Sheela Sathyanarayana
  • Ted Schettler
  • Rachel M. Shaffer
  • Bhavna Shamasunder
  • Peggy M. Shepard
  • Kristin Shrader-Frechette
  • Gina M. Solomon
  • Wilma A. Subra
  • Laura N. Vandenberg
  • Julia R. Varshavsky
  • Roberta F. White
  • Ken Zarker
  • Lauren Zeise
Environmental Health (2023) 21 (S1)
Science advice: making credences accurate
  • Simon Blessenohl
  • Deniz Sarikaya
Synthese (2022) 200 (2)
Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Jennifer B. Sass
  • David Gee
  • Simona A. Bălan
  • Linda Birnbaum
  • Vincent James Cogliano
  • Courtney Cooper
  • Kristi Pullen Fedinick
  • Roy M. Harrison
  • Marike Kolossa-Gehring
  • Daniele Mandrioli
  • Mark A. Mitchell
  • Susan L. Norris
  • Christopher J. Portier
  • Kurt Straif
  • Theo Vermeire
Environmental Health (2022) 21 (1)
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
  • Jan P. Vandenbroucke
  • Erik Von Elm
  • Douglas G. Altman
  • Peter C. Gotzsche
  • Cynthia D. Mulrow
  • Stuart J. Pocock
  • Charles Poole
  • James J. Schlesselman
  • Matthias Egger
Current Pediatrics (2022) 21 (3): 173.
Use of supporting evidence by health and industry organisations in the consultation on e-cigarette regulations in New Zealand
  • Lucy Hardie
  • Judith McCool
  • Becky Freeman
  • Ghaffar Ali
PLOS ONE (2022) 17 (9): e0275053.
Disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest in evidence underpinning vitamin D and calcium recommendations in bone health guidelines
  • Liora Baram
  • Zhaoli Dai
  • Sally McDonald
  • Lisa A Bero
Public Health Nutrition (2022) 25 (8): 2288.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. Translation to Russian
  • Jan P. Vandenbroucke
  • Erik Von Elm
  • Douglas G. Altman
  • Peter C. Gotzsche
  • Cynthia D. Mulrow
  • Stuart J. Pocock
  • Charles Poole
  • James J. Schlesselman
  • Matthias Egger
Digital Diagnostics (2021) 2 (2): 119.
The Limits of Conventional Justification: Inductive Risk and Industry Bias Beyond Conventionalism
  • Miguel Ohnesorge
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (2020) 5
Association of food industry ties with findings of studies examining the effect of dairy food intake on cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Alice Fabbri
  • Sally McDonald
  • Joanna Diong
  • Joanne E McKenzie
  • Lisa Bero
BMJ Open (2020) 10 (12): e039036.
Memoranda of understanding: a tobacco industry strategy to undermine illicit tobacco trade policies
  • Eric Crosbie
  • Stella Bialous
  • Stanton A Glantz
Tobacco Control (2019) 28 (e2): e110.
Association of industry ties with outcomes of studies examining the effect of wholegrain foods on cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Alice Fabbri
  • Sally McDonald
  • Jessica Turton
  • Margaret Allman-Farinelli
  • Joanne McKenzie
  • Lisa Bero
BMJ Open (2019) 9 (5): e022912.
Research agendas for profitable invasive species
  • Melina Kourantidou
  • Brooks A. Kaiser
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy (2019) 8 (2): 209.
Conflicts of interest between the sugary food and beverage industry and dental research organisations: time for reform
  • Cristin E Kearns
  • Lisa A Bero
The Lancet (2019) 394 (10194): 194.
Protecting science from the dark side: Commercial funding of research
  • Jennifer S. Mindell
  • Ron Buliung
  • Stephen J. Watkins
Journal of Transport & Health (2019) 15: 100796.
Ten tips for spotting industry involvement in science policy
  • Lisa Bero
Tobacco Control (2019) 28 (1): 1.
Philip Morris International-funded ‘Foundation for a Smoke-Free World’: analysing its claims of independence
  • Yvette van der Eijk
  • Lisa A Bero
  • Ruth E Malone
Tobacco Control (2019) 28 (6): 712.
Associations between industry involvement and study characteristics at the time of trial registration in biomedical research
  • Anna Lene Seidler
  • Kylie E. Hunter
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Lisa M. Askie
  • Jennifer A. Hirst
PLOS ONE (2019) 14 (9): e0222117.
The hidden power of corporations
  • Martin McKee
  • Sarah Steele
  • David Stuckler
BMJ l4.
The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review
  • Alice Fabbri
  • Alexandra Lai
  • Quinn Grundy
  • Lisa Anne Bero
American Journal of Public Health (2018) 108 (11): e9.
Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in regulatory toxicology and pharmacology
  • Clayton Velicer
  • Gideon St. Helen
  • Stanton A. Glantz
Journal of Public Health Policy (2018) 39 (1): 34.
Public health journals’ requirements for authors to disclose funding and conflicts of interest: a cross-sectional study
  • Karim N. Daou
  • Maram B. Hakoum
  • Assem M. Khamis
  • Lama Bou-Karroum
  • Ahmed Ali
  • Joseph R. Habib
  • Aline T. Semaan
  • Gordon Guyatt
  • Elie A. Akl
BMC Public Health (2018) 18 (1)
The promise and perils of industry‐funded science
  • Bennett Holman
  • Kevin C. Elliott
Philosophy Compass (2018) 13 (11)
US Media Coverage of Tobacco Industry Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives
  • Patricia A. McDaniel
  • E. Anne Lown
  • Ruth E. Malone
Journal of Community Health (2018) 43 (1): 117.
Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda
  • Alice Fabbri
  • Taylor J Holland
  • Lisa A Bero
Public Health Nutrition (2018) 21 (18): 3422.
Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of randomized controlled trials included in systematic reviews of nutrition interventions to address obesity
  • Alice Fabbri
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Gyorgy Scrinis
  • Lisa A Bero
Public Health Nutrition (2017) 20 (7): 1306.
An academic researcher's guide to increased impact on regulatory assessment of chemicals
  • Marlene Ågerstrand
  • Anna Sobek
  • Karl Lilja
  • Maria Linderoth
  • Lina Wendt-Rasch
  • Ann-Sofie Wernersson
  • Christina Rudén
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts (2017) 19 (5): 644.
Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of cohort studies examining the association between nutrition and obesity
  • Alice Fabbri
  • Nicholas Chartres
  • Lisa A Bero
Public Health Nutrition (2017) 20 (17): 3193.
Children's and parents' opinions on the sport‐related food environment: a systematic review
  • M. Smith
  • L. Signal
  • R. Edwards
  • J. Hoek
Obesity Reviews (2017) 18 (9): 1018.
Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section
  • Charlotta Pisinger
Preventive Medicine (2016) 85: 115.
Employing the Precautionary Principle to Evaluate the Use of E-Cigarettes
  • Ashley M. Bush
  • James W. Holsinger
  • Lawrence D. Prybil
Frontiers in Public Health (2016) 4
'It will harm business and increase illicit trade': an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012
  • K. A. Evans-Reeves
  • J. L. Hatchard
  • A. B. Gilmore
Tobacco Control (2015) 24 (e2): e168.
Beyond disclosure: gambling research, political economy, and incremental reform
  • Martin Young
  • Francis Markham
International Gambling Studies (2015) 15 (1): 6.
Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid: Table 1
  • Eric Crosbie
  • Stanton A Glantz
Tobacco Control (2014) 23 (3): e7.
Nonindustry-Sponsored Preclinical Studies on Statins Yield Greater Efficacy Estimates Than Industry-Sponsored Studies: A Meta-Analysis
  • David Krauth
  • Andrew Anglemyer
  • Rose Philipps
  • Lisa Bero
  • Malcolm R. Macleod
PLoS Biology (2014) 12 (1): e1001770.
A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products
  • Jenny L Hatchard
  • Gary J Fooks
  • Karen A Evans-Reeves
  • Selda Ulucanlar
  • Anna B Gilmore
BMJ Open (2014) 4 (2): e003757.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration
  • Jan P. Vandenbroucke
  • Erik von Elm
  • Douglas G. Altman
  • Peter C. Gøtzsche
  • Cynthia D. Mulrow
  • Stuart J. Pocock
  • Charles Poole
  • James J. Schlesselman
  • Matthias Egger
International Journal of Surgery (2014) 12 (12): 1500.
Protecting the World From Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure: Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go From Here?
  • J. Barnoya
  • A. Navas-Acien
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (2013) 15 (4): 789.
Enticing the New Lad: Masculinity as a Product of Consumption in Tobacco Industry—Developed Lifestyle Magazines
  • Daniel K. Cortese
  • Pamela M. Ling
Men and Masculinities (2011) 14 (1): 4.
Global Health Philanthropy and Institutional Relationships: How Should Conflicts of Interest Be Addressed?
  • David Stuckler
  • Sanjay Basu
  • Martin McKee
PLoS Medicine (2011) 8 (4): e1001020.
“A delicate diplomatic situation”: tobacco industry efforts to gain control of the Framingham Study
  • Janine K. Cataldo
  • Lisa A. Bero
  • Ruth E. Malone
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2010) 63 (8): 841.
Philip Morris involvement in the development of an air quality laboratory in El Salvador
  • C E Kummerfeldt
  • J Barnoya
  • L Bero
Tobacco Control (2009) 18 (3): 241.
Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración
  • Jan P. Vandenbroucke
  • Erik Von Elm
  • Douglas G. Altman
  • Peter C. Gøtzsche
  • Cynthia D. Mulrow
  • Stuart J. Pocock
  • Charles Poole
  • James J. Schlesselman
  • Matthias Egger
Gaceta Sanitaria (2009) 23 (2): 158.e1.
Compromise or Capitulation? US Food and Drug Administration Jurisdiction Over Tobacco Products
  • Stanton A. Glantz
  • Richard Barnes
  • Sharon Y. Eubanks
PLoS Medicine (2009) 6 (7): e1000118.
An experimental investigation of tobacco smoke pollution in cars
  • Taryn Sendzik
  • Geoffrey T. Fong
  • Mark J. Travers
  • Andrew Hyland
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (2009) 11 (6): 627.
Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry
  • J E Cohen
  • M Zeller
  • T Eissenberg
  • M Parascandola
  • R O’Keefe
  • L Planinac
  • S Leischow
Tobacco Control (2009) 18 (3): 228.
Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control
  • Hadii M. Mamudu
  • Ross Hammond
  • Stanton Glantz
Social Science & Medicine (2008) 67 (11): 1690.
  • Online ISSN 1527-1927
  • Print ISSN 0361-6878
  • Copyright © 2024 Duke University Press
  • Duke University Press
  • 905 W. Main St. Ste. 18-B
  • Durham, NC 27701
  • USA
  • Phone
  • (888) 651-0122
  • International
  • +1 (919) 688-5134
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
Duke University Press
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept