Partisan Responses to Public Health Messages: Motivated Reasoning and Sugary Drink Taxes
J Health Polit Policy Law (2017) 42 (6): 1005–1037.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: a systematic review with meta-analysis
- J. P. Reynolds
- K. Stautz
- M. Pilling
- S. van der Linden
- T. M. Marteau
Royal Society Open Science (2020) 7 (1): 190522.
Elucidating individuals’ beliefs about the severity of eating disorders and obesity: implications for public health programs
- Bianca Bullivant
- Deborah Mitchison
- Sarah Skromanis
- Jonathan Mond
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity (2019)
“My good friends on the other side of the aisle aren’t bothered by those facts”: U.S. State legislators’ use of evidence in making policy on abortion
- Katie Woodruff
- Sarah C.M. Roberts
Television News Coverage of Public Health Issues and Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice
- Sarah E. Gollust
- Erika Franklin Fowler
- Jeff Niederdeppe
Annual Review of Public Health (2019) 40 (1): 167.
Anti-Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Messages Elicit Reactance: Effects on Attitudes and Policy Preferences
- James Price Dillard
- Jinyoung Kim
- Shu Scott Li
Journal of Health Communication (2018) 23 (8): 703.
Impact of tax and subsidy framed messages on high- and lower-sugar beverages sold in vending machines: a randomized crossover trial
- Sharna Si Ying Seah
- Salome A. Rebello
- Bee Choo Tai
- Zoey Tay
- Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Rob M. van Dam
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2018) 15 (1)
Communicating quantitative evidence of policy effectiveness and support for the policy: Three experimental studies
- J.P. Reynolds
- M. Pilling
- T.M. Marteau
Social Science & Medicine (2018) 218: 1.