This article discusses some of the merits and demerits of the single-payer model of health care financing, with particular reference to the English National Health Service (NHS). Specifically, it is argued that the main merits are that the model can directly provide universal health care coverage, thus eradicating or at least alleviating market failure and equity concerns, and that it can achieve this with relatively low total health care expenditure in general and—as compared to the commercial multiple insurance model—low administrative costs in particular. A perceived demerit of the single-payer model is that it can lead to excessive health care rationing, particularly in terms of waiting times, although it is argued here that long waits are probably caused by insufficient funding rather than by the single-payer model per se. Moreover, rationing of one form or another occurs in all health care systems, and single-payer models may be the best option if the aim is to incorporate structured rationing such that an entire population is subject to the same rules and is thus treated equitably. A further perceived disadvantage of the single-payer model is that it offers limited choice, which is necessarily true with respect to choice of insurer, but choice of provider can be, and increasingly is, a feature of centrally tax-financed health care systems. No model of health care funding is perfect; trade-offs are inevitable. Whether the merits of the single-payer model are judged to outweigh the demerits will typically vary both across countries at any point in time and within a country over time.

This content is only available as a PDF.
Appleby, J., N. Devlin, and D. Parkin.
2007
. NICE's Cost Effectiveness Threshold. How High Should It Be?
BMJ
335
:
358
-359.
Bevan, G., and R. Robinson.
2005
. The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics: Path Dependency in Health Care in England.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
30
:
53
-78.
Brown, L. D.
1991
. The National Politics of Oregon's Rationing Plan.
Health Affairs
10
(
2
):
28
-51.
Chinitz, D.
2004
. Health Technology Assessment in Four Countries: Response from Political Science.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
20
:
55
-60.
Danzon, P. M.
1992
. Hidden Overhead Costs: Is Canada's System Really Less Expensive?
Health Affairs
11
(
1
):
21
-43.
Drummond, M.
2007
. NICE: A Nightmare Worth Having?
Health Economics, Policy, and Law
2
:
203
-208.
Evans, R. G.
2007
. Extravagant Americans, Healthier Canadians: The Bottom Line in North American Health Care. In
Canada and the United States: Differences That Count
, 3rd ed., ed. D. M. Thomas and B. B. Torrey,
135
-164. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Himmelstein, D. U., and S. Woolhandler.
2003
. National Health Insurance or Incremental Reform: Aim High, or at Our Feet?
American Journal of Public Health
93
:
102
-105.
Jost, T. S.
2008
.
Health Care at Risk: A Critique of the Consumer-Driven Movement
. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Le Grand, J., and P. Vizard.
1998
. The National Health Service: Crisis, Change, or Continuity? In
The State of Welfare: The Economics of Social Spending
, 2nd ed., ed. H. Glennerster and J. Hills,
75
-121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyman, J. A.
2003
.
The Theory of Demand for Health Insurance
. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sen, A. K.
1985
.
Commodities and Capabilities
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheldon, T. A., N. Cullum, D. Dawson, A. Lankshear, K. Lowson, I. Watt, P. West, D. Wright, and J. Wright.
2004
. What's the Evidence That NICE Guidance Has Been Implemented? Results from a National Evaluation Using Time Series Analysis, Audit of Patients' Notes, and Interviews.
BMJ
329
:
999
-1003.
United Kingdom. Department of Health.
1991
.
The Patient's Charter
. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
____. Department of Health.
2000
-2008.
Hospital Inpatient Waiting List Statistics, England, NHS Trust Based: The “Green Book.”
London: Department of Health.
____. Department of Health.
2000
.
The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform
. Cm. 4818-I. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
____. Department of Health.
2002
.
Delivering the NHS Plan
. Cm. 5503. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
United Kingdom. Healthcare Commission.
2006
.
Survey of Inpatients 2005
. London: Healthcare Commission.
United Kingdom. Office for National Statistics (ONS).
2008
.
Social Trends 38
. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
United Kingdom Parliament. 2006. NHS Management and Administration Costs. Hansard Report 677 (92). January 23. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldhansrd/vo060123/text/60123w02.htm#60123w02_sbhd3.
United Kingdom. Royal Commission.
1979
.
Report of the Royal Commission on the National Health Service
. Cmnd 7615. London: HMSO.
Wanless, D.
2002
.
Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View
. Final Report.
April
. London: Her Majesty's Treasury.
Williams, I., S. Bryan, and S. McIver.
2007
. How Should Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Be Used in Health Technology Coverage Decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Approach.
Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
12
:
73
-79.