This paper traces the implementation of Michigan's program for hospital bed reduction through four phases in the critical first 30 months following enactment: standard-setting, plan development, plan approval, and legislative oversight. Procedural complexity and goal conflict complicated implementation from the start: what began as a simple proposal to close unneeded beds soon became enmeshed in efforts to address longstanding issues of equity in access to care. A combination of administrative, political, and economic factors peculiar to Michigan, as well as the more generic problems incurred in applying a regulatory approach to containing medical care costs, contributed to the difficulties encountered in implementing bed reduction. Long-range prospects for the program depend upon whether the modest results it is likely to achieve are deemed to be worth the costs incurred in administering it.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 1984
Implementing Regulatory Reform: The Saga of Michigan's Debedding Experiment
Eugenia S. Carpenter;
J Health Polit Policy Law (1984) 9 (3): 453–473.
Eugenia S. Carpenter, Pamela Paul-Shaheen; Implementing Regulatory Reform: The Saga of Michigan's Debedding Experiment. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1984; 9 (3): 453–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9-3-453
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In