This paper examines four propositions inherent in competitive approaches to containing the growth of health care expenditures: (1) that health maintenance organizations can deliver health care less expensively than the fee-for-service system; (2) that under certain competitive conditions. HMOs would prosper; (3) that HMO successes would force FFS insurers and providers to become more efficient; and (4) that creating the competitive conditions would be politically feasible. Reasons for doubting the latter three propositions are plentiful, and the strategy is therefore judged unlikely to succeed.
- Views Icon Views
Carl G. Homer; Some Pitfalls in Creating Competition between Hmos and Fee-for-Service Delivery. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1982; 7 (3): 686–706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-7-3-686
Download citation file:
- Share Icon Share