Recent court decisions have stressed the necessity for cost-benefit analysis in evaluating Occupational and Safety Health Administration (OSHA) standards, thus raising difficult ethical questions which this paper analyzes using classical approaches of deontology and teleology. Since both modes of analysis have deficiencies, the need for a synthesis using economic and noneconomic measures is suggested.
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Copyright © 1980 by the Dept. of Health Administration, Duke University
1980
Issue Section:
ARTICLE
You do not currently have access to this content.