Immediately following adoption of Proposition 13 in California in June of 1978, the state legislature adopted a Bail-Out program which included procedures for monitoring the detrimental effects of disproportionate reductions in public health, inpatient and outpatient county budgets. For a variety of reasons, the methodology and procedures employed failed to reveal the adverse effects of Proposition 13 on health services. This paper deals with the actual and potential role of health systems agencies (HSAs) in monitoring such effects, commenting in public hearings on budget review and, in general, playing a policy analysis role that links local government with the citizenry on the one hand and the state government on the other. In addition to identifying the weakness of the State's monitoring effort in identifying negative effects in program analysis and staffing reductions, the findings point out the limited role of HSAs. Specific recommendations are offered for improvement of HSA involvement in future resource allocation planning in California and the United States as a whole.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| February 01 1980
The Planner as Public Health Resource Allocator: Post-Proposition 13 County Health Services in California and the Role of the Hsas in Budget Review and Public Hearings
J Health Polit Policy Law (1980) 5 (1): 55–80.
Cyril Roseman; The Planner as Public Health Resource Allocator: Post-Proposition 13 County Health Services in California and the Role of the Hsas in Budget Review and Public Hearings. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 February 1980; 5 (1): 55–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-5-1-55
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In