Citizens, especially those who are knowledgeable and care the most about politics, are motivated to defend their beliefs and attitudes in the face of discrepant information. These motivated biases strongly influence the way people think about health care policies and the politicians and parties that propose or attack these contentious policies. Three cognitive mechanisms are identified: a prior belief effect, confirmation bias, and disconfirmation bias. Together, these information processes conspire to produce persistence and polarization of opinion on health care policies.
Research Article|December 01 2011
Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion
J Health Polit Policy Law (2011) 36 (6): 935-944.
April A. Strickland, Charles S. Taber, Milton Lodge; Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 December 2011; 36 (6): 935–944. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460524
Download citation file: