That Medicare is universal for seniors is widely accepted by leading analysts. But in the context of developing detailed policies that seek to cover as many people as possible, it is inaccurate to make Medicare eligibility sound so simple and inclusive. To estimate the number of seniors without full federal Medicare Part A coverage, we examined data for uninsured seniors, seniors with Medicaid and no Medicare coverage of any kind, seniors with Medicare Part B but without Part A, and seniors bought into Part A by their state Medicaid programs. We found that in 2005, 1.6 million seniors—or 5 percent of the elderly U.S. population—were without a full federal Part A premium subsidy. The share of seniors without this benefit was notably higher in the nation's two largest states—California (12 percent) and New York (8 percent). We estimate that reforming Medicare Part A to make the benefit truly universal and fully federal would cost the federal government $6 billion in new spending in federal fiscal year 2011, an increase in baseline federal Medicare expenditures of 1.1 percent.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| February 01 2010
Measuring Coverage for Seniors in Medicare Part A and Estimating the Cost of Making It Universal
Elizabeth M. Patchias
J Health Polit Policy Law (2010) 35 (1): 49–62.
Michael Birnbaum, Elizabeth M. Patchias; Measuring Coverage for Seniors in Medicare Part A and Estimating the Cost of Making It Universal. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 February 2010; 35 (1): 49–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-040
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
Participation without Representation? Senior Opinion, Legislative Behavior, and Federal Health Reform