Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 126.96.36.199. If your access is via an institutional subscription, please contact your librarian to request reinstatement. If you are using a personal subscription, please contact the Duke University Press using the Contact Us form.
Ruth McDonald, Joseph White, Theodore R. Marmor; Paying for Performance in Primary Medical Care: Learning About and Learning from “Success” And “Failure” In England and California. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 October 2009; 34 (5): 747–776. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-024
Paying physicians to hit performance targets is becoming increasingly fashionable, as evidenced by the growing number of “pay-for-performance” programs in the United States and beyond. This article compares pay-for-performance initiatives in two nations—the United Kingdom and the United States. It pays particular attention to the context in which the initiatives were conceived and implemented, factors which are largely neglected in the pay-for-performance literature. Despite some glowing reviews of the UK national pay-for-performance program for primary care doctors, we suggest that such programs face significant technical obstacles in all cases and particularly severe institutional obstacles in the United States.