The question posed in this article is whether single-payer health care systems are more likely to provide equal treatment for equal need (horizontal equity) than are multipayer systems. To address this question, we compare access to primary and specialty health care services across selected neighborhoods, grouped by average household income, in a single-payer system (the English NHS), a multiple-payer system with universal coverage (French National Health Insurance), and the U.S. multiple-payer system characterized by large gaps in health insurance coverage. We find that Paris residents, including those with low incomes, have better access to health care than their counterparts in Inner London and Manhattan. This finding casts doubt on the notion that the number of payers influences the capacity of a health care system to provide equitable access to its residents. The lesson is to worry less about the number of payers and more about the system's ability to assure access to primary and specialty care services.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| August 01 2009
Achieving Horizontal Equity: Must We Have a Single-Payer Health System?
Michael K. Gusmano;
Victor G. Rodwin
J Health Polit Policy Law (2009) 34 (4): 617–633.
Michael K. Gusmano, Daniel Weisz, Victor G. Rodwin; Achieving Horizontal Equity: Must We Have a Single-Payer Health System?. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 August 2009; 34 (4): 617–633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-018
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
Does All-Payer Rate Setting Work? The Case of the New York Prospective Hospital Reimbursement Methodology