To determine which factors influence states' allocation decisions for the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement and the four individual settlements' annual payments, including the decision to securitize, we analyzed the effects of voter characteristics, political parties, interest groups, prior spending on public tobacco control programs, and state fiscal health on per capita settlement funds allocated to tobacco-control, health, and other programs. Tobacco-producing states and those with high proportions of conservative Democrats or elderly, black, Hispanic, or wealthy people tended to spend less on tobacco control. Education and medical lobbies had strong positive influences on per capita allocations for tobacco-control and health-related programs. State fiscal crises affected amounts spent by states from settlement funds as well as the probability of securitizing future cash flows from the settlements.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| August 01 2005
Determinants of States' Allocations of the Master Settlement Agreement Payments
Frank A. Sloan;
Emily Streyer Carlisle;
John R. Rattliff;
J Health Polit Policy Law (2005) 30 (4): 643–686.
Frank A. Sloan, Emily Streyer Carlisle, John R. Rattliff, Justin Trogdon; Determinants of States' Allocations of the Master Settlement Agreement Payments. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 August 2005; 30 (4): 643–686. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-30-4-643
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
Anathemas and Blessings: Negotiating Group Identity and State Ownership Through the Constitution in Cyprus, 1959–74