In this article we analyze the evolution of market-oriented health care reforms in the Netherlands. We argue that these reforms can be characterized as policy learning within and between competing policy programs. Policy learning denotes the process by which policy makers and stakeholders deliberately adjust the goals, rules, and techniques of a given policy in response to past experiences and new information. We discern three distinctive periods. During the first period (1988-1994), the prevailing corporatist and etatist policy programs were seriously challenged by the proponents of a new market-oriented program. But when it came to political decision making and implementation, the market-oriented program soon lost its impetus because it was technically too complex and could not provide short-term solutions to meet the urgent need for cost containment. During the second period (1994-2000),the etatist program regained its previously dominant position. In parallel to a strengthening of supply and price controls, however, the government also persevered in creating the technical and institutional preconditions for regulated competition. Moreover, public discontent over waiting lists and the call for more autonomy by individual providers and insurers strengthened the alliance in favor of regulated competition. This led to the revival of the market-oriented program in a 2001 reform plan. We conclude that the odds of these new post-2001 reforms succeeding are substantially higher than in the fi rst period due to the technical and institutional adjustments that have taken place in the past decade.
Market-Oriented Health Care Reforms and Policy Learning in the Netherlands
Jan-Kees Helderman, Frederik T. Schut, Tom E. D. van der Grinten, Wynand P. M. M. van de Ven; Market-Oriented Health Care Reforms and Policy Learning in the Netherlands. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 April 2005; 30 (1-2): 189–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-30-1-2-189
Download citation file: