This article concludes that substantial excess neurosurgical capacity exists. Neurosurgery like other specialties has permitted almost free entry and as a result of such factors as high earnings and status, excess capacity has developed and because of insufficient competition it has not been eliminated. The costs of excess capacity include idle capacity and an alleged reduction in skill levels. The neurosurgery market's performance is evaluated and it is found that while relative income has declined, entry has continued at a high rate; excess capacity is therefore not being eliminated. Policy recommendations of a pro-competitive variety are suggested to improve the market's performance instead of regulation (whether governmental or by the profession itself).
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 1978
Market Power and Resource Misallocation in Medicine: The Case of Neurosurgery
J Health Polit Policy Law (1978) 3 (3): 345–360.
Erwin A. Blackstone; Market Power and Resource Misallocation in Medicine: The Case of Neurosurgery. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1978; 3 (3): 345–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3-3-345
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
Unlocking the Mindware: The Responsibility of Building a Solipsistic Universe in Murakami Haruki’s Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World