Existing accounts of the Clinton health reform efforts of the early 1990s neglect to examine how the change in big business reform interests during the short period between the late 1980s and 1994 might have altered the trajectory of compulsory health insurance legislation in Congress. This article explores evidence that big employers lost their early interest in reform because they believed their private remedies for bringing down health cost inflation were finally beginning to work. This had a discouraging effect on reform efforts. Historical analysis shows how hard times during the Great Depression also aligned big business interests with those of reformers seeking compulsory social insurance. Unlike the present case, however, the economic climate did not quickly improve, and the social insurance reform of the New Deal succeeded. The article speculates, therefore, that had employer health expenditures not flattened out, continuing and even growing big business support might have neutralized small business and other opposition that contributed heavily to the failure of reform. Thus in light of the Clinton administration's demonstrated willingness to compromise with business on details of its plan, some kind of major reform might have succeeded.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01 2002
Foul Weather Friends: Big Business and Health Care Reform in the 1990s in Historical Perspective
J Health Polit Policy Law (2002) 27 (4): 605–638.
Citation
Peter Swenson, Scott Greer; Foul Weather Friends: Big Business and Health Care Reform in the 1990s in Historical Perspective. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 August 2002; 27 (4): 605–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-27-4-605
Download citation file:
Advertisement