In what respects does public-policy making reflect social learning, drawing lessons from previous experiences and from the experiences of governments in other settings? Starting with an examination of the effect of policy legacies on current policy making, I present a process model of social learning embedded within the larger policy-making process resting at the intersection of the nation’s constitutional context, technological change, and political influences exogenous to social learning. The model first distinguishes between the structural and the social learning effects of policy legacies. I then conceptually divide social learning into separate streams of substantive learning and situational learning. The effect that each of these has on policy making depends on the relative position of three categories of participants in the policy-making process (experts, organized interests, and politicians), as well as on the scope of the policy issue being considered (ranging from routine change to major reform). This analysis, with reference to recent health care policy making, reveals the full extent to which social learning is often a decidedly political struggle over ideas and information in which advocates promote lessons that serve their specific interests within a given institutional context and political setting. I consider the implications of social learning for understanding likely policy responses to the rise of market forces in health care.
Research Article|August 01 1997
Mark A. Peterson; The Limits of Social Learning: Translating Analysis into Action. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 August 1997; 22 (4): 1077–1114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-22-4-1077
Download citation file: