Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 126.96.36.199. If your access is via an institutional subscription, please contact your librarian to request reinstatement. If you are using a personal subscription, please contact the Duke University Press using the Contact Us form.
Andrew L. Hyams, David W. Shapiro, Troyen A. Brennan; Medical Practice Guidelines in Malpractice Litigation: An Early Retrospective. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 April 1996; 21 (2): 289–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-21-2-289
The role of practice guidelines in malpractice litigation has been discussed in some theoretical detail. Little information is available, however, on how courts use guidelines or on the effort of state legislatures to explicitly link guideline compliance with malpractice defenses. We review all relevant case law and legislative enactments to shed light on the influence of medical malpractice on guidelines. We also use data from a nationwide survey of malpractice attorneys to supplement our legal analysis. Although guidelines are being used for both inculpatory and exculpatory purposes in common-law litigation (a two-way street), legislatures are interested in applying them only for exculpatory purposes (a one-way street).