While support for the development of clinical guidelines is widespread, there is little agreement about how they should be used. Because cost control is the force behind the medical effectiveness movement, the payers' preference, to link clinical guidelines to reimbursement, will likely prevail. We examine the utilization review programs of Medicare Part B carriers and the carriers' attempts to use clinical guidelines to determine medical necessity for the purpose of payment. We find that because the utilization review programs are driven by concerns about cost control, the carriers' actual review process relies on aggregate utilization and spending targets that have little to do with clinical guidelines. The carriers' medical review rhetoric using the terms medically unnecessary and fraud and abuse as synonymsalso highlights their focus on cost control and the lack of concern about why services are used inappropriately.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| February 01 1994
How Will We Use Clinical Guidelines? The Experience of Medicare Carriers
Colleen M. Grogan;
Roger D. Feldman;
John A. Nyman;
J Health Polit Policy Law (1994) 19 (1): 7–26.
Colleen M. Grogan, Roger D. Feldman, John A. Nyman, Janet Shapiro; How Will We Use Clinical Guidelines? The Experience of Medicare Carriers. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 February 1994; 19 (1): 7–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-19-1-7
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In