The politics of American health insurance is a struggle over which vision of distributive justice should govern: the solidarity principle or the logic of actuarial fairness. Actuarial fairness is central to American private health insurance. It is both an antiredistributive ideology and a method of organizing mutual aid by fragmenting communities into ever-smaller, more homogeneous groups, leading ultimately to the destruction of mutual aid. This fragmentation is accomplished by fostering in people a sense of their differences and their responsibility for themselves, rather than their commonalities and interdependence. Actuarial fairness developed as a business strategy for gaining market share. Medical underwriting, which is far more extensive than commonly known, is the information technology used for implementing actuarial fairness. Despite significant changes in the political context of health insurance which are leading toward restraints on underwriting, the logic of actuarial fairness is so deeply embedded in the structure of competitive markets in insurance and so deeply consonant with social divisions in American society that eradicating it will take more than any current reform proposals contemplate.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 01 1993
The Struggle for the Soul of Health Insurance
J Health Polit Policy Law (1993) 18 (2): 287–317.
Deborah A. Stone; The Struggle for the Soul of Health Insurance. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 April 1993; 18 (2): 287–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-18-2-287
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
The Long Shadow of the Past: Risk Pooling and the Political Development of Health Care Reform in the States