In this article, I examine Wennberg's “practice style” hypothesis and the literature on variations among small areas. According to Wennberg, geographic variations in rates of per capita use for many clinical procedures arise mainly from differences over what constitutes appropriate care. I show, however, that the role of practice style in explaining variations among areas has not been clearly demonstrated. I also argue that the practice style hypothesis can neither be established nor refuted by the methods traditionally used to study small areas and, moreover, that inferences about practice style variations cannot be drawn from differences among areas in their rates of use. I thus conclude that more research at the micro level in the practice patterns of the individual physician is needed before major health care initiatives based on small area methodology are undertaken.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 1991
Further Issues in Small Area Variations Analysis
J Health Polit Policy Law (1991) 16 (3): 573–588.
Miron Stano; Further Issues in Small Area Variations Analysis. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1991; 16 (3): 573–588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-16-3-573
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In