Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 188.8.131.52. If your access is via an institutional subscription, please contact your librarian to request reinstatement. If you are using a personal subscription, please contact the Duke University Press using the Contact Us form.
Paul J. Godt; Confrontation, Consent, and Corporatism: State Strategies and the Medical Profession in France, Great Britain, and West Germany. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1987; 12 (3): 459–480. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12-3-459
The economic disorders of the last decade have compelled European welfare states to seek more stringent controls over costly social policies such as health care, thus circumscribing professional sovereignty. However, several factorsinstitutional structure, cultural values, political/economic circumstances, patterns of state/professional relationsconstrain the policy alternatives available to governments, and make fundamental reform very difficult to achieve. After analyzing these factors and the reform policies adopted in France, Great Britain, and West Germany, this article will examine and compare the strategies pursued to meet professional resistance to change.