Medical devices include thousands of products, many of which have greatly contributed to the quality of health care. As devices have proliferated, so have public policies that affect them. The federal government intervened to promote three fundamental values: safety by federal regulation, innovation through federal funding of research and development, and access by providing services under Medicare. The policies generally coexisted without conflict. However, two recent developments—the advent of cost containment and the expansion of the tort liability system—present a potentially disruptive influence on these policies, and threaten to undermine the values they serve. Because cost restraints are inevitable and the tort system provides consumer protection, the challenge for policymakers is to reconcile them with the values of safety, innovation, and access. The proposals presented here seek to promote coordination to protect those values without imposing unacceptable costs on the health care system.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 1986
Coexistence, Conflict, and Cooperation: Public Policies toward Medical Devices
Susan Bartlett Foote
J Health Polit Policy Law (1986) 11 (3): 501–523.
Susan Bartlett Foote; Coexistence, Conflict, and Cooperation: Public Policies toward Medical Devices. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 June 1986; 11 (3): 501–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11-3-501
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
The Story of Untold Displacements: Buddhist-Muslim Intimacies and Visions of Ethnic Coexistence in a Thai Queer-Feminist Filmic Archive
Punctuated Equilibrium and Path Dependency in Coexistence: The Israeli Health System and Theories of Change