Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.104.22.168. If your access is via an institutional subscription, please contact your librarian to request reinstatement. If you are using a personal subscription, please contact the Duke University Press using the Contact Us form.
John A. Robertson; Legal Aspects of Withholding Treatment from Handicapped Newborns: Substantive Issues. J Health Polit Policy Law 1 April 1986; 11 (2): 215–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11-2-215
The controversy over nontreatment of handicapped newborns arises in a context of criminal and civil law, against which the current controversy has unfolded. This article examines the legal setting and background under traditional criminal and civil law concepts of nontreatment of handicapped newborns. It focuses on substantive principles of law, showing that nontreatment would be legally permitted when treatment could not be reasonably said to be in the interest of the patient involved, and that nontreatment could be considered criminal where treatment would serve patient interests. It then relates this analysis to procedural issues and the federal Baby Doe legislation and regulations that have recently emerged.