... in the sciences, including political economy. In comparison, natural theology was for Richard Whately as structuring on these issues as it was for the Cambridge men. Whately's view on natural theology, however, conformed with the Ricardian predilection for theory over facts. The differences between the Cambridge...

...: Christian Political Economy 1798-1883 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ____. 1994 . Whately, Senior, and the Methodology of Classical Economics. In Economics and Religion: Are They Distinct? edited by G. Brennan and A. M. C. Waterman. Boston:Kluwer. Whately, R. 1828 . Review of Oxford...

... are de- voted to various instruments of propagation: the Whately Chair of Political Economy at Trinity College Dublin, political economy at the Queen’s Colleges, the Barring- ton Lectures and the Dublin Statistical Society, and textbooks for children used in the national schools throughout...

... Whately, and thence to a non-Anglican Thomas Chalmers. Viewed from the perspective of classical economic theory, the material on Chalm- ers is valuable and revealing. However, the thread with Christian social thought was based on Anglicanism, and Chalmers serves 2s a distraction here. Scant atten...

.... The Sydney Magazine of Science and Art 1: 124- 28. Seligman, Ben B. 1962. Main currents in modern economics: economic thought since 1870. New York. Whately, Richard. [ 18321 1966. Introductory lectures on political economy. Re- print of the 2d ed. New York. Whewell, Rev. William. 1837...

... and Opinion. Journal of Political Economy 46.4 : 571 -75. Wallas, Graham. 1898 . The Life of Francis Place: 1771-1854 . London: Longmans, Green. Whately, E. J. 1866 . Life and Correspondence of Richard Whately, D.D . London: Longmans, Green. Whately, Richard. 1833 . Easy Lessons on Money...

...) was supposed to be compatible with Christian belief and of service to Newtonian natural theology. This changed suddenly in 1798. Thomas Robert Malthus's first Essay inaugurated “economics” (the study of scarcity), seemingly incompatible with the Christian religion. Richard Whately's distinction between...

..., such as Malthus, Whately, Senior, and Mill. Despite this and his having been trained initially as a businessman, he devoted no special attention to economics. Nonetheless, he tackled certain topics of undoubted socioeconomic importance, such as the slave trade and the colonial question and overseas trade...

... to develop a satisfactory economic theodicy (following similar lack of success by Malthus, Sumner, Whately, and Chalmers) contributed to the collapse of the British tradition of scientific natural theology and the subsequent separation of theology from political economy in the middle decades...

... ’s “arrangements” of various moral theories, hardly a contribution to the formulation of Jevons’s under- standing of “man’s nature.” (2) White writes that “Bostaph insists that Jevons’s ‘major debt’ was to Adam Smith” rather than to Richard Whately. This is a misreading of my...

... to the question of railways. The Sydney Magazine of Science and Art 1 : 124 -28. Seligman , Ben B. 1962 . Main currents in modern economics: economic thought since 1870 . New York. Whately , Richard [1832] 1966 . Introductory lectures on political economy . Reprint of the 2d ed. New York...

... wrote a review of Buckland’s Reli- quiae Diluvianae. His tutee, the Rev. Richard Whately, attended Buckland’s geology lectures, and while professor of political economy at Oxford warned fellow clergymen not to confuse the truths of geology with those of Scripture. At Cambridge the Rev. Richard...

... back at least to the days of James Mill and Richard Whately in the nineteenth century. In heated debates with his contemporaries about the proper method of political economy, deductive or inductive, first Drummond professor in political economy in Oxford and later archbishop of Dublin, Whately argued...

... of scarcity created by population pressures. As later developed by William Paley, John Bird Sumner, and Richard Whately, these population pressures played a central role in a theodicy in which God subjected us to them so that they would discipline us. This line of thought continued to disentangle...

... of its Whately Chair of Political Economy in 1832. Antoin Murphy examines Mountiford Longfield’s appointment as the first occupant of this chair. Immediately after his elevation as archbishop of the Church of Ireland, Whately, who had been Drummond Profes- sor at Oxford, established a chair...

...- mathena in 1983, is a product of a series of lectures held at Trinity College, Dublin, to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the founding of its Whately Chair of Political Economy in 1832. Antoin Murphy examines Mountiford Longfield’s appointment as the first occupant of this chair. Immediately...

... of the Whately Chair at Trinity College, Dublin. Butt’s poignant and uncompromising evaluation of English policy during the Irish famine, which first appeared in the Di72cbZilb Unisewity Magazine 29 (April 1847) : 501-40, was publishcd under the titlc A Voice...

..., unpublished manuscript. (Orig. 1877.) Goldstrom , J. M. 1966 . ‘Richard Whately and political economy in school books, 1833–80.’ Irish Historical Studies 15 . 2 ( Sept. ): 131 -46. Grampp , William D. 1976 . ‘Scots, Jews, and subversives among the dismal scientists.’ Journal...

.... Here Longfield’s interest is that of developing a theory of market price. So important is this problem to Longfield that he approvingly mentions Whately’s suggestion (though Whately is not identified as its author) that Political Economy be re- named the science of market exchangeJ3...

...- cardo, James E. Thorold Rogers, Nassau Senior, Henry Sidgwick, Wil- liam Thornton, Thomas Tooke, Col. Robert Torrens, and Richard Whately. I have added four other economists to Stigler’s list: A. L. Bowley, John Maynard Keynes, and A. C. Pigou, who published their major works after 1915...