Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
Neyman and Pearson hypothesis testing
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-13 of 13 Search Results for
Neyman and Pearson hypothesis testing
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (1995) 27 (Supplement): 39–52.
Published: 01 December 1995
...! In 1933, Fisher was enjoying his newest invention, the enigma
of fiducial probability. Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing was a half-
5. The problem followed Jeffreys through much of his career. See, e.g., section 3.10 (es-
pecially p. 182) in Theoty of Probabifip ([I961J 1967) to see...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2024) 56 (S1): 207–233.
Published: 01 December 2024
... of the same coin. [email protected] Copyright 2024 by Duke University Press 2024 Milton Friedman methodology Statistical Research Group sequential analysis Neyman and Pearson hypothesis testing The role of statistics is not to discover truth. —Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman ( 1998...
FIGURES
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (1999) 31 (4): 607–651.
Published: 01 November 1999
... in the 1930s, nine in the 1940s). The
majority of these involved the calculation of the standard error of the
prediction of a regression equation. Not a single Fisherian or Neyman-
Pearson hypothesis test appears in the sample.
I have looked at each statistical article in the sample and have...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2010) 42 (1): 111–154.
Published: 01 March 2010
... : 497 –512. ———. 1976 . The Emergence of Mathematical Statistics: A Historical Sketch with Particular Reference to the United States. In On the History of Statistics and Probability , edited by D. B. Owen. New York: Dekker. Neyman, J., and E. S. Pearson. 1928 . On the Use of Certain Test...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2011) 43 (suppl_1): 109–139.
Published: 01 December 2011
... shall be
glad to cooperate with you in constructing new test cases and in get-
ting to the bottom of this issue.
Frisch and the Probability Approach 121
3. Frisch and Neyman
Jerzy Neyman figures in the history of econometrics mainly through the
Neyman-Pearson...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2007) 39 (3): 511–527.
Published: 01 September 2007
... are correct.
Neyman had come to this idea while working on hypothesis testing with
Egon Pearson in the 1920s. Neyman was skeptical of Fisher’s goal of
17. See Kneeland, Schoenberg, and Friedman 1936, 137–39; and Schoenberg and Parten
1937, 312–13.
18. See Kneeland, Schoenberg, and Friedman 1936...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (1995) 27 (Supplement): 272–284.
Published: 01 December 1995
... for and Lawlor on, 3; Darity on
Fluctuations in General Prices,” Moggridge’s article, 243-46; and
280 Index
Marshall-Keynes relationship, 130, Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing,
135; on Tomlinson’s article, 87-91 4 142,45
Monetary and fiscal policy: British, Nordhaus, William, 186, 201...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2000) 32 (Suppl_1): 25–70.
Published: 01 December 2000
...
of producer risk and consumer risk that corresponded to type 1
and type 2 errors in the Neyman-Pearson probability scheme for
testing hypotheses.
4. Institutionalized incentives for static mathematical theory on the
one hand and dynamic practice on the other generated construc-
tive tension...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2011) 43 (suppl_1): 333–354.
Published: 01 December 2011
...”
with, 111, 116–18, 124n11 (Pearson), 37
and Koopmans, Tjalling, 124–27 Reid, Margaret, 318
modeling, 110–11 Reiersøl, Olav, 112, 117
Neyman, Jerzy, interaction with, “Relative Importance of Heredity
121–24...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2011) 43 (suppl_1): 35–56.
Published: 01 December 2011
... exchanges between biology, eco-
nomics, and psychology: nearly all of the exchanges were with the statisti-
cal hub so that only people there—Pearson, Yule, Fisher, and later Jerzy
Neyman—saw what was going on in more than one field.
The arrival on the scene of Ragnar Frisch, Harold Hotelling...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2024) 56 (3): 561–586.
Published: 01 June 2024
..., after which they corresponded almost until they both died in the 1960s. Fisher, who had been trained in England by Pearson, had a difficult relationship with his mentor, characterized by heated academic controversies. Perhaps Wilson saw in Fisher an ally for dealing with his own struggles...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (2014) 46 (2): 211–229.
Published: 01 June 2014
... of no return”) on Haavelmo. Koopmans spent the autumn of 1935 at the
University Institute of Economics and gave a series of lectures on “modern sampling theory,”
discussing Fisher’s theory of estimation and the Neyman-Pearson theory of hypothesis test-
ing. Haavelmo (1938) reviewed Koopmans’s (1937...
Journal Article
History of Political Economy (1998) 30 (Supplement): 260–292.
Published: 01 December 1998
... was that they generally lost sight of the whole program of testing
price theory; repeated ritual invocations of Neyman-Pearson language
could not repress the fact that pervasive freedom in model selection
and immunizing stratagems could never be adequately encompassed by
the framework of Type I/Type II errors...