Adam Smith's “Two Distinct Benefits” From Trade: The Dead End of “Vent-for-Surplus” Interpretations | Citedby Results | History of Political Economy | Duke University Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Adam Smith's “Two Distinct Benefits” From Trade: The Dead End of “Vent-for-Surplus” Interpretations

History of Political Economy (2015) 47 (4): 577–603.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Factors of international trade in tourist services: theoretical aspects

Yuriy I. Stadnytskyy
Yuliya I. Bashynska

Regional Economy (2023) (1(107)): 126.

International Trade Theories and Decision-Making Areas in the Field of Development Strategy

Stadnicki Jerzy
Oksanych Oleksandr

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (2022) 19: 521.

ALTERING THE PATTERN OF TRADE IN THEWEALTH OF NATIONS: ADAM SMITH AND THE HISTORIOGRAPHY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THEORY

Reinhard Schumacher

Journal of the History of Economic Thought (2020) 42 (1): 19.

THE LIMITS OF MERCANTILE ADMINISTRATION: ADAM SMITH AND EDMUND BURKE ON BRITAIN’S EAST INDIA COMPANY

Gregory M. Collins

Journal of the History of Economic Thought (2019) 41 (03): 369.

Retrospectives: Adam Smith's Discovery of Trade Gravity

Bruce Elmslie

Journal of Economic Perspectives (2018) 32 (2): 209.