Abstract
According to the dominant interpretation, Carl Menger, the founder of the Austrian school, was an Aristotelian methodologist of social science. As this article attempts to demonstrate, this influence was not decisive in shaping Menger's methodology. In fact, Menger shared several core positions with modern thinkers. Such non-Aristotelian threads in Menger tackled in the article encompass his views on essentialism and realism, a priori knowledge, the classification of sciences, and scientific value-freedom, as well as methods of historical inquiry. As is shown, while unattachable to any specific philosophical school, those five elements constitute a fairly consistent, non-Aristotelian account of economic methodology.
essentialism, Austrian school of economics, Methodenstreit, Aristotelianism, methodology of economics, conventionalism
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Bibliography
Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. (1949)
1973
. Problems and Theories of Philosophy
. Translated by Henryk Skolimowski and Anthony Quinton. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Alter, Max.
1990
. Carl Menger and the Origins of Austrian Economics
. Boulder, Colo.
: Westview Press
.Arena, Richard, and Sandye Gloria-Palermo.
2008
. “Menger and Walras on Money: A Comparative View
.” History of Political Economy
40
, no. 2
: 317
–43
.Aristotle
. 1984
. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation
. Translated by Jonathan Barnes. 2
vols. Princeton, N.J.
: Princeton University Press
.Benton, Ted, and Ian Craib.
2001
. Philosophy of Social Science: Philosophical Issues in Social Thought
. London
: Palgrave Macmillan
.Birner, Jack.
1990
. “A Roundabout Solution to a Fundamental Problem in Menger's Methodology and Beyond.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics
, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell. History of Political Economy
22
(supplement
): 241
–61
.Blaug, Mark.
1980
. The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Bostaph, Samuel.
1978
. “The Methodological Debate between Carl Menger and the German Historicists
.” Atlantic Economic Journal
6
, no. 3
: 3
–16
.Buechner, M. Northrup.
1992
. Review of Carl Menger and the Origins of Austrian Economics
, by Max Alter. Southern Economic Journal 58
, no. 4
: 1122
–23
.Campagnolo, Gilles.
2000
. “Learning from Hitotsubashi's Carl Menger Library (Questioning the Origins of Austrian Economics)
.” Bulletin of the Center for Historical Social Science Literature
20
:1
–16
. https://doi.org/10.15057/5421.Campagnolo, Gilles.
2008
. “Carl Menger: From the Works Published in Vienna to His Nachlass
.” In Carl Menger: Neu erörtert unter Einbeziehung nachgelassener Texte, Discussed on the Basis of New Findings
, edited by Gilles Campagnolo, 31
–58
. Frankfurt am Main
: Peter Lang
.Campagnolo, Gilles.
2012
. Criticisms of Classical Political Economy: Menger, Austrian Economics, and the German Historical School
. London
: Routledge
.Campagnolo, Gilles.
2022
. “Was Menger Aristotelian? A Rejoinder and Clarification
.” Cosmos + Taxis
10
, nos. 5–6
: 88
–99
.Campagnolo, Gilles, and Aurélien Lordon.
2011
. “Menger était-il aristotélicien? Nouvelles réflexions sur un débat déjà ancien à l'occasion d'une réponse à Ricardo F. Crespo
.” In Existe-t-il une doctrine Menger? Aux origines de la pensée économique autrichienne
, edited by Gilles Campagnolo, 45
–74
. Aix-en-Provence
: Presses universitaires de Provence
.Cartwright, Nancy.
1994
. “Mill and Menger: Ideal Elements and Stable Tendencies.” In Idealization VI: Idealization in Economics
, edited by Bert Hamminga and Neil De Marchi, 171
–88
. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 38. Amsterdam
: Rodopi
.Cassirer, Ernst. (1932)
2009
. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment
. Translated by Fritz Koelln and James Pettegrove. Princeton, N.J.
: Princeton University Press
.Colander, David, and Huei-Chun Su.
2015
. “Making Sense of Economists’ Positive-Normative Distinction
.” Journal of Economic Methodology
22
, no. 2
: 157
–70
.Crespo, Ricardo.
2002
. “Reappraising Austrian Economics’ Basic Tenets in the Light of Aristotelian Ideas
.” Review of Austrian Economics
15
, no. 4
: 313
–33
.Crespo, Ricardo.
2003
. “Three Arguments against Menger's Suggested Aristotelianism
.” Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines
13
, no. 1
: 63
–84
.Cubeddu, Raimondo.
2005
. The Philosophy of the Austrian School
. London
: Routledge
.Descartes, René. (1701)
1958
. “Rules for the Guidance of Our Native Powers
.” In Philosophical Writings
, translated by Norman Kemp Smith, 1
–89
. New York
: Modern Library
.Dika, Tarek.
2023
. “Descartes’ Method
.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/descartes-method/.Dobretsberger, Josef.
1949
. “Zur Methodenlehre C. Mengers und der österreichischen Schule
.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie / Journal of Economics
12
, no. 2/4
: 218
–29
.Dold, Malte, and Mario Rizzo.
2023
. “Menger's Exact Laws, the Role of Knowledge, and Welfare Economics
.” Review of Austrian Economics
36
, no. 2
: 163
–82
.Dumsday, Travis.
2010
. “Natural Kinds and the Problem of Complex Essences
.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy
88
, no. 4
: 619
–34
.Fabian, Reinhard, and Peter Simons. (1986)
2010
. “The Second Austrian School of Value Theory
.” In Austrian Economics: Historical and Philosophical Background
, edited by Wolfgang Grassl and Barry Smith, 29
–78
. London
: Routledge
.Gloria-Palermo, Sandye.
1999
. The Evolution of Austrian Economics: From Menger to Lachmann
. London
: Routledge
.Gordon, David. (1994)
2020
. The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics
. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Hausman, Daniel.
1992
. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Hettche, Matt, and Corey Dyck.
2019
. “Christian Wolff
.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/wolff-christian/.Hobbes, Thomas.
1839
. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury
. Edited by William Molesworth. 12
vols. London
: John Bohn
.Hoppe, Hans-Hermann.
1995
. Economic Science and the Austrian Method
. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Huerta de Soto, Jesús.
1998
. “The Ongoing Methodenstreit of the Austrian School
.” Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines
8
, no. 1
: 75
–114
.Hutchison, Terence.
1973
. “Some Themes from ‘Investigation into Method.’
” In Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics
, edited by John Hicks and Wilhelm Weber, 15
–37
. Oxford
: Clarendon Press
.Ikeda, Yukihiro.
2012
. “Carl Menger's Subjectivism: ‘Types,’ Economic Subjects, and Microfoundation
.” In Subjectivism and Objectivism in the History of Economic Thought
, edited by Yukihiro Ikeda and Kiichiro Yagi, 91
–106
. London
: Routledge
.Jaffé, William.
1976
. “Menger, Jevons, and Walras De-homogenized
.” Economic Inquiry
14
, no. 4
: 511
–24
.Johnston, William.
1972
. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938
. Berkeley
: University of California Press
.Kauder, Emil.
1957
. “Intellectual and Political Roots of the Older Austrian School
.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie / Journal of Economics
17
, no. 4
: 411
–25
.Kauder, Emil.
1962
. “Aus Mengers nachgelassenen Papieren
.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv
89
:1
–28
.Kauder, Emil.
1965
. A History of Marginal Utility Theory
. Princeton, N.J.
: Princeton University Press
.Kirzner, Israel.
1976
. “On the Method of Austrian Economics
.” In The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics
, edited by Edwin Dolan, 40
–51
. Kansas City, Mo.
: Sheed & Ward
.Kirzner, Israel.
1978
. “The Entrepreneurial Role in Menger's System
.” Atlantic Economic Journal
6
, no. 3
: 31
–45
.Kirzner, Israel.
1994
. “Value-Freedom
.” In The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
, edited by Peter Boettke, 313
–19
. Cheltenham
: Edward Elgar
.Klooster, Jens van ’t.
2022
. “Marginalism and Scope in the Early Methodenstreit
.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought
44
, no. 1
: 105
–24
.Kraus, Oskar.
1905
. “Die aristotelische Werttheorie in ihren Beziehungen zu den Lehren der modernen Psychologenschule
.” Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft / Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics
61
, no. 4
: 573
–92
.Lachmann, Ludwig.
1977
. “The Significance of the Austrian School of Economics in the History of Ideas
.” In Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process
, edited by Walter Grinder, 45
–64
. Kansas City, Mo.
: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel
.Lagueux, Maurice.
1996
. “Von Mises’ Apriorism and Austrian Economics: From Menger to Mises
.” http://mapageweb.umontreal.ca/lepagef/dept/cahiers/lagueux_von_mises.pdf.Lakatos, Imre.
1970
. “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions
.” PSA
: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
, 91
–136
.Leszczyński, Damian.
2023
. Puste naczynia: Studia z filozofii współczesnej
. Kraków
: Universitas
.Linsbichler, Alexander.
2017
. Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist? A New Analysis of the Epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics
. Cham
: Palgrave Macmillan
.Linsbichler, Alexander.
2021
. “Austrian Economics without Extreme Apriorism: Construing the Fundamental Axiom of Praxeology as Analytic
.” Synthese
198
, no. 14
: 3359
–90
.Long, Roderick.
2006
. “Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman
.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
9
, no. 3
: 3
–23
.Long, Roderick.
2022
. “Praxeology
.” In A Modern Guide to Austrian Economics
, edited by Per Bylund, 6
–16
. Cheltenham
: Edward Elgar
.Machlup, Fritz.
1955
. “The Problem of Verification in Economics
.” Southern Economic Journal
22
, no. 1
: 1
–21
.Mäki, Uskali.
1990a
. “Mengerian Economics in Realist Perspective
.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics
, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell. History of Political Economy 22
(supplement
): 289
–310
.Mäki, Uskali.
1990b
. “Scientific Realism and Austrian Explanation
.” Review of Political Economy
2
, no. 3
: 310
–44
.Mäki, Uskali.
1997
. “Universals and the Methodenstreit: A Re-examination of Carl Menger's Conception of Economics as an Exact Science
.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
, Part A, 28
, no. 3
: 475
–95
.Matson, Erik.
2023
. “Ethical Economics or Economical Ethics? Considerations out of Carl Menger
.” Review of Austrian Economics
36
, no. 2
: 311
–30
.Menger, Carl. (1873)
2011
. Principles of Economics
. Translated by James Dingwall and Bert Hoselitz. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Menger, Carl.
1883
. Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der politischen Oekonomie insbesondere
. Leipzig
: Duncker & Humblot
.Menger, Carl. (1883)
1985
. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences
. Edited by Louis Schneider. Translated by Francis Nock. New York
: New York University Press
.Menger, Carl. (
1884
) 2020. “The Errors of Historicism in German Economics
.” Translated by Karen Horn and Stefan Kolev. Econ Journal Watch
17
, no. 2
: 442
–507
.Menger, Carl. (1889)
1960
. “Toward a Systematic Classification of the Economic Sciences
.” In Essays in European Economic Thought
, translated and edited by Louise Sommer, 1
–38
. Princeton, N.J.
: D. Van Nostrand
.Milford, Karl.
1990
. “Menger's Methodology
.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics
, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell. History of Political Economy 22
(supplement
): 215
–39
.Milford, Karl.
2010
. “A Note on Menger's Problem Situation and Non-essentialist Approach to Economics
.” In Austrian Economics in Transition: From Carl Menger to Friedrich Hayek
, edited by Harald Hagemann, Tamotsu Nishizawa, and Yukihiro Ikeda, 154
–75
. London
: Palgrave Macmillan UK
.Mill, John Stuart. (1844)
1948
. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy
. London
: London School of Economics and Political Science
.Mises, Ludwig von. (1933)
2003
. Epistemological Problems of Economics
. Translated by George Reisman. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Mises, Ludwig von. (1949)
1998
. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics
. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Mises, Ludwig von.
1962
. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method
. Princeton, N.J.
: D. Van Nostrand
.Mittermaier, Karl.
2018
. “Menger's Aristotelianism
.” Cambridge Journal of Economics
42
, no. 2
: 577
–94
.Noras, Andrzej.
2005
. Kant a neokantyzm badeński i marburski
. Katowice
: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
.Noras, Andrzej.
2012
. Historia neokantyzmu
. Katowice
: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
.Nussbaum, Martha.
2016
. “Economics Still Needs Philosophy
.” Review of Social Economy
74
, no. 3
: 229
–47
.Oderberg, David.
2011
. “Essence and Properties
.” Erkenntnis
75
, no. 1
: 85
–111
.Popper, Karl. (1934)
2005
. The Logic of Scientific Discovery
. London
: Routledge
.Robitaille, Christian.
2022
. “Carl Menger on Theory and History
.” Cosmos + Taxis
10
, nos. 5–6
: 61
–74
.Rothbard, Murray.
1956a
. “In Defense of ‘Extreme Apriorism.’
” Southern Economic Journal
23
, no. 3
: 314
–20
.Rothbard, Murray.
1956b
. “Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics
.” In On Freedom and Free Enterprise: The Economics of Free Enterprise
, edited by Mary Sennholz, 244
–62
. Princeton, N.J.
: D. Van Nostrand
.Rothbard, Murray. (1962)
2009
. Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market
. Scholar's ed. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Rothbard, Murray. (1976)
2011
. “New Light on the Prehistory of the Austrian School
.” In Economic Controversies
, 139
–60
. Auburn, Ala.
: Ludwig von Mises Institute
.Samuelson, Paul.
1938
. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour
.” Economica
5
, no. 17
: 61
–71
.Samuelson, Paul.
1972
. The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson
. Edited by Robert Merton. Vol. 3
. Cambridge, Mass.
: MIT Press
.Scheall, Scott.
2017
. “What Is Extreme about Mises's Extreme Apriorism?
” Journal of Economic Methodology
24
, no. 3
: 226
–49
.Scheall, Scott.
2022
. “The Mengers versus Mises on Matters Methodological
.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
29
, no. 5
: 938
–66
.Schnädelbach, Herbert.
1984
. Philosophy in Germany, 1831–1933
. Translated by Eric Matthews. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Schnädelbach, Herbert.
1985
. “Philosophie
.” In Philosophie: Ein Grundkurs
, edited by Ekkehard Martens and Herbert Schnädelbach, 37
–76
. Reinbek bei Hamburg
: Rowohlt
.Schumacher, Reinhard, and Scott Scheall.
2020
. “Karl Menger's Unfinished Biography of His Father: New Insights into Carl Menger's Life through 1889
.” In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on Economists and Authoritarian Regimes in the 20th Century
, edited by Luca Fiorito, Scott Scheall, and Carlos Eduardo Suprinyak, 38B
:155
–89
. Leeds
: Emerald
.Schumpeter, Joseph. (1914)
1954
. Economic Doctrine and Method: An Historical Sketch
. Translated by Reinhold Aris. New York
: Oxford University Press
.Silverman, Paul.
1990
. “The Cameralistic Roots of Menger's Achievement
.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics
, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell. History of Political Economy 22
(supplement
): 69
–91
.Slenzok, Norbert.
2023
. “Menger's Untersuchungen and the Methodological Development of the Austrian School
.” In Mengerian Economics
, edited by Alicja Sielska, Łukasz Jasiński, and Krzysztof Turowski, 21
–41
. Cheltenham
: Edward Elgar
.Smith, Barry. (1986)
2010
. “Austrian Economics and Austrian Philosophy
.” In Austrian Economics: Historical and Philosophical Background
, edited by Wolfgang Grassl and Barry Smith, 1
–28
. London
: Routledge
.Smith, Barry.
1990a
. “Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics
.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics
, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell. History of Political Economy 22
(supplement
): 263
–88
.Smith, Barry.
1990b
. “On the Austrianness of Austrian Economics
.” Critical Review
4
, nos. 1–2
: 212
–38
.Smith, Barry.
1990c
. “The Question of Apriorism
.” Austrian Economics Newsletter
, nos. 1–2
: 1
–5
.Smith, Barry.
1994a
. “Aristotelianism, Apriorism, Essentialism
.” In The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
, edited by Peter Boettke, 33
–37
. Cheltenham
: Edward Elgar
.Smith, Barry.
1994b
. Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano
. Chicago
: Open Court
.Solari, Stefano.
2022
. “Menger and the Continental Epistemology of Uncertainty
.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
29
, no. 5
: 920
–37
.Streissler, Erich.
1972
. “To What Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?
” History of Political Economy
4
, no. 2
: 426
–41
.Tribe, Keith.
2007
. Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Turowski, Krzysztof.
2023
. “Carl Menger and His Philosophical Influences
.” In Mengerian Economics
, edited by Alicja Sielska, Łukasz Jasiński, and Krzysztof Turowski, 1
–20
. Cheltenham
: Edward Elgar
.Vaughn, Karen.
1990
. “The Mengerian Roots of the Austrian Revival
.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics
, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell. History of Political Economy 22
(supplement
): 379
–407
.Weber, Max.
1949
. The Methodology of the Social Sciences
. Edited by Edward Shils and Henry Finch. Glencoe, Ill.
: Free Press
.Wendt, Alexander.
1999
. Social Theory of International Politics
. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.Windelband, Wilhelm. (1884)
1998
. “History and Natural Science
.” Theory and Psychology
8
, no. 1
: 5
–22
.Wiśniewski, Jakub Bożydar.
2014
. “The Methodology of the Austrian School of Economics: The Present State of Knowledge
.” Wroclaw Economic Review
20
, no. 1
: 39
–54
.Yagi, Kiichiro
1997
. “Carl Menger and the Historicism in Economics
.” In Methodology of the Social Sciences, Ethics, and Economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker
, edited by Peter Koslowski, 231
–58
. Heidelberg
: Springer
.Zanotti, Gabriel, and Nicolás Cachanosky.
2015
. “The Epistemological Implications of Machlup's Interpretation of Mises's Epistemology
.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought
37
, no. 1
: 111
–38
.Zweig, Stefan. (1942)
2011
. The World of Yesterday
. Translated by Benjamin Huebsch and Helmut Ripperger. Lexington, Mass.
: Plunket Lake Press
.Copyright 2025 by Duke University Press
2025
