The deregulatory moment of the late 1970s increased the policy influence of economics in the United States by linking the efforts of two distinct communities of economists: a systems analytic group and an industrial organization (I/O) group. The systems analytic group, which used cost-benefit analysis to improve government decision making, had considerable success in the 1960s and helped create offices of economists throughout the executive branch, but was losing momentum by 1970. The I/O group was, by the mid-1970s, working from the White House to reduce economic regulation—eliminating price and entry controls across a range of industries—but its ability to act was limited. After 1975 the I/O group increasingly focused on social regulation—rules meant to improve health, environmental, or safety conditions—and pushed for cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of such regulations. In the process, its efforts became linked with the legacy of systems analysis, leading to legal requirements for cost-benefit analysis of regulation and the expansion of executive-branch offices oriented toward economics—changes that opened doors to the future exchange of ideas between academe and the policy domain.
Skip Nav Destination
December 1, 2017
Roger E. Backhouse Béatrice Cherrier
Research Article| December 01 2017
From Economic to Social Regulation: How the Deregulatory Moment Strengthened Economists’ Policy Position
Elizabeth Popp Berman
History of Political Economy (2017) 49 (Supplement): 187–212.
Elizabeth Popp Berman; From Economic to Social Regulation: How the Deregulatory Moment Strengthened Economists’ Policy Position. History of Political Economy 1 December 2017; 49 (Supplement): 187–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-4166323
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
Implementation Rationality: The Nexus of Psychology and Economics at the RAND Logistics Systems Laboratory, 1956–1966
Systems Analysis as Infrastructural Knowledge: Scientific Expertise and Dissensus under State Socialism
Responding to Obesity in Brazil: Understanding the International and Domestic Politics of Policy Reform Through a Nested Analytic Approach to Comparative Analysis