Leigh Payne’s monograph Unsettling Accounts is important in two ways. First of all, it analyzes publications and documents of agents of state violence from four societies that are icons of extreme repression and violation of human rights (and in at least the first two cases, of an explicitly neofascist apparatus): Argentina, Chile, Brazil, and South Africa. These four cases diverge fundamentally in the institutional circumstances and structure of state violence — particularly the rhetoric and discourse strategies used to defend it to the citizenry and in international forums — and the analysis, accommodation, and consequences of it in a subsequent democratic institutionalization and public accounting (especially the relationship of state violence to far-reaching sociohistorical circumstances that turn on the issue of circumstantial exceptionalism). Yet in all four cases there has been enormous international interest. Payne’s discussion of the phenomenon of state violence (or state terrorism, to use Eduardo Luis Duhalde’s...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
February 01 2010
Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence
Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence
. By Payne, Leigh A.. Durham, NC
: Duke University Press
, 2008
. Photographs. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index.
xvi
, 376
pp. Cloth
, $84.95. Paper
, $23.95.Hispanic American Historical Review (2010) 90 (1): 207–208.
Citation
David William Foster; Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence. Hispanic American Historical Review 1 February 2010; 90 (1): 207–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-2009-130
Download citation file:
Advertisement
34
Views