The three authors of this study have collaborated in an effort to reconstruct the sociocultural history of Iximché, the political capital of the most powerful Late Postclassic Kaqchikel-Mayan polity of the Guatemalan highlands. Their overall methodology consists of describing and interpreting information from three different sources: archaeology, forensics, and ethnohistory. They take the position that the different kinds of information generally complement one another. By integrating the three types of sources, they claim to have achieved the first substantive history of Iximché, one of the most comprehensive examinations of ceramics in highland Guatemala based on modern techniques of analysis, and perhaps the most exhaustive study of skeletal remains of a highland Mayan population. It seems to me that they have indeed realized their claims with the publication of this book. Incidentally, I do not think that the authors have been pretentious about their study. As they state in the conclusions,...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
May 01 2005
Archaeology and Ethnohistorty of Iximché
Archaeology and Ethnohistorty of Iximché
. By Nance, C. Roger, Whittington, Stephen, and Borg, Barbara E.. Contributions by Guillemin, George and Manrique, Sergio Rodas. Gainesville
: University Press of Florida
, 2003
. Photographs
. Illustrations. Maps. Tables. Figures. Appendixes. Bibliography. Index.
xxiv
, 407
pp. Cloth
, $65.00.Hispanic American Historical Review (2005) 85 (2): 312–313.
Citation
Robert M. Carmack; Archaeology and Ethnohistorty of Iximché. Hispanic American Historical Review 1 May 2005; 85 (2): 312–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-85-2-312
Download citation file:
Advertisement
37
Views