This case study of a Pentecostal church in a poor suburb of Buenos Aires greatly illuminates—if it does not bring closure to—much of the ongoing debate about the causes and consequences of Pentecostalism in Latin America. Daniel Míguez calls in question the emphasis that writers have placed on Pentecostalism as essentially a function of structural change, whether the phenomenon is viewed primarily as reinforcing traditional culture or supporting the modernization process. While he concedes that some authors like Cecilia Mariz and Elizabeth Brusco have avoided this reductionism by their attention to personal perceptions and initiatives, he criticizes the failure of “actor-centered” scholars to report their findings in a way that permits data taken from specific social contexts to be used comparatively. Both “structuralist” and “actor-centered” researchers have used too broad a conceptual brush to describe Pentecostals, distorting rather than clarifying the nature of their development and, probably, overestimating their social...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
August 01 2000
Spiritual Bonfire in Argentina: Confronting Current Theories with an Ethnographic Account of Pentecostal Growth in a Buenos Aires Suburb
Spiritual Bonfire in Argentina: Confronting Current Theories with an Ethnographic Account of Pentecostal Growth in a Buenos Aires Suburb
. By Míguez, Daniel. Latin American Studies Series, no. 81
. Amsterdam
: Centro de Estudios y Documentación Latinoamericanos (CEDLA)
, 1998
. Tables. Notes. Bibliography. Index. viii, 204 pp. Paper
, $25.00.Hispanic American Historical Review (2000) 80 (3): 630–631.
Citation
Everett A. Wilson; Spiritual Bonfire in Argentina: Confronting Current Theories with an Ethnographic Account of Pentecostal Growth in a Buenos Aires Suburb. Hispanic American Historical Review 1 August 2000; 80 (3): 630–631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-80-3-630
Download citation file:
Advertisement
5
Views