Over the past decade, liberals have rallied around the cause of gender-inclusive public restrooms, putatively as a way to provide trans and gender-nonconforming people with access to safe facilities, while also building a social movement for gender freedom. At the same time, liberals have remained largely silent on the ongoing surveillance, harassment, assault, arrest, and public shaming of men who cruise public restrooms. How might we make sense of this discrepancy? This essay offers a hypothesis for this relative silence: cruising is intolerable to liberals insofar as it evokes the pleasure of antisocial and self-shattering relations, thereby threatening social commitments. This hypothesis helps explain why liberals, in defending trans and gender-nonconforming peoples’ restroom access, have characterized and reinforced restrooms as nonsexual spaces, effectively insulating gender non-normativity from the stain of sexual perversion. The issues of restroom access and cruising are thus more closely related than they may initially appear to be, as are the liberal silence surrounding cruising and conservative transphobia and transmisogyny.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2025
Lust Room
Greg Goldberg
Greg Goldberg is an associate professor in the department of sociology at Wesleyan University. He is the author of Antisocial Media: Anxious Labor in the Digital Economy (2018). His work has appeared in Convergence, Social Media and Society, New Media and Society, WSQ, ephemera, and in the edited collection The Affective Turn (2007).
Search for other works by this author on:
GLQ (2025) 31 (1): 57–80.
Citation
Greg Goldberg; Lust Room. GLQ 1 January 2025; 31 (1): 57–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-11521470
Download citation file:
Advertisement
195
Views