There has been far more attention to narrative than to metaphor among scholars looking at clinical care. In this article, I consider the relationship between metaphor and narrative in a contested confrontation between family members and clinicians over a do-not-resuscitate decision. Drawing upon a key metaphor in biomedicine, the body as machine, I consider its canonical uses but also its limits and the way it is contested, refuted, and even “poached” by one family in its battle with clinicians. I also explore the relationship between metaphor and narrative as I consider the divergence of framing between clinicians and family as connected to the way the machine-body metaphor is embedded within different and perhaps even incommensurable narrative horizons.
Skip Nav Destination
Cheryl Mattingly; The Machine-Body as Contested Metaphor in Clinical Care. Genre 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 363–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00166928-1407549
Download citation file: