Skip to Main Content
Duke University Press Logo Open Menu
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Browse by volume
Volume 24, Issue 5
June 2012
Federal Sentencing Reporter Cover Image for Volume 24, Issue 5
ISSN 1053-9867
EISSN 1533-8363
Search within issue

The Post-Booker Advisory Guidelines: Problem or Solution?

Editor's Observations

It's Alive! The Federal Booker-Fix Debate Stirs
Frank O. Bowman, III
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

The House Divided

Chairman's Statement to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, House Judiciary Committee, October 12, 2011: Hearing on “Uncertain Justice: The Status of Federal Sentencing and the U.S. Sentencing Commission Six Years after U.S. v. Booker”
F. James Sensenbrenner Jr.
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Booker Is the Fix
Robert C. “Bobby” Scott
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

The Sentencing Commission

Testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, House Judiciary Committee, October 12, 2011: Hearing on “Uncertain Justice: The Status of Federal Sentencing and the U.S. Sentencing Commission Six Years after U.S. v. Booker”
Judge Patti B. Saris
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

The Justice Department

Testimony on Behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice before the U.S. Sentencing Commission, February 16, 2012
Matthew Axelrod
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

The Case for Change

Testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, House Judiciary Committee, October 12, 2011: Hearing on “Uncertain Justice: The Status of Federal Sentencing and the U.S. Sentencing Commission Six Years after U.S. v. Booker”
Matthew S. Miner
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Nothing Is Not Enough: Fix the Absurd Post-Booker Federal Sentencing System
Frank O. Bowman, III
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

The Case for the Status Quo

Testimony on Behalf of the American Bar Association before the U.S. Sentencing Commission, February 16, 2012
James E. Felman
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Testimony on Behalf of Federal Public and Community Defenders before the U.S. Sentencing Commission, February 16, 2012
Raymond Moore
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Is Now the Time for Major Federal Sentencing Reform?
Sara Sun Beale
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
The U.S. Sentencing Commission's Best Response to Booker Is to Do Nothing
Michael Tonry
View articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
All Issues

Advertisement

  • Online ISSN 1533-8363
  • Print ISSN 1053-9867
  • Copyright © 2025 Duke University Press
  • Duke University Press
  • 905 W. Main St. Ste. 18-B
  • Durham, NC 27701
  • USA
  • Phone
  • (888) 651-0122
  • International
  • +1 (919) 688-5134
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
Duke University Press
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept