Abstract
These Editor's Observations introduce Volume 24, Number 5 of the Federal Sentencing Reporter, an issue devoted to renewed discussion in Congress and the U.S. Sentencing Commission about whether there is a need for legislative action to revise or replace the advisory federal sentencing guidelines system judicially created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 decision in United States v. Booker. It describes the basic positions of the main institutional actors, briefly summarizes the articles in the issue, and makes a prediction about the likelihood of action in the near term.
Federal Sentencing Guidelines, criminal law, sentencing, Booker, Blakely, Apprendi, United States Sentencing Commission, sentencing commission, criminal sentencing, Department of Justice, Booker fix, sentencing reform, federal sentencing, sentencing guidelines
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
© The Ohio State University
You do not currently have access to this content.