The thesis that California's native peoples were infected with Old World diseases prior to the founding of the first mission in 1769 is attracting increasing attention but is not widely accepted by students of the state's prehistoric and colonial periods. The perceived lack of irrefutable proof that exotic pestilence was transmitted to California after the Columbian landfall but before foreign settlement is, in part, responsible for this lack of recognition. This article scrutinizes many varied lines of evidence that are interpreted as strong indicators of premission pestilence. As a consequence,researchers of California's prehistoric and colonial past are urged to seriously consider the profound implications for the interpretation of archaeological, biological, and ethnographic data.
Skip Nav Destination
Neil L Whitehead
Research Article| January 01 2002
Portents of Plague from California's Protohistoric Period
Ethnohistory (2002) 49 (1): 69–121.
William L. Preston; Portents of Plague from California's Protohistoric Period. Ethnohistory 1 January 2002; 49 (1): 69–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-49-1-69
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
All in the Family: Descent and Succession in the Protohistoric Chiefdoms of the Greater Antilles—a Comment on Curet
The Chief Is Dead, Long Live... Who? Descent and Succession in the Protohistoric Chiefdoms of the Greater Antilles