As Emily Violet Maddox explains about the work of disability in the writings of Walter Benjamin, “Redemption in a Benjaminian sense means that objects are ruptured from their place in the order of things. Thus, things or, as I will argue, bodies which have been ordered through their use values or their commodity value, can be redeemed by being used otherwise.”1 In making this argument, Maddox takes up a formative approach that guides many contemporary disability studies methodologies developed as “cripistemologies” (a term theorized by Merri Lisa Johnson and Robert McRuer).2 Cripistemological approaches challenge the presumed desirability of the normal and reorient readers toward less beaten pathways. Such alternative vantage points and practices dislocate our expectations and foreground productive, more foundational interdependencies otherwise obscured by the myth of independence. The object, as Maddox explains, does not even have to be representative of a disabled person; genres, metaphors, and...

You do not currently have access to this content.