This article is the transcript of a round-table talk delivered at the 2011 annual meeting of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT) in Cleveland, Ohio. It considers the paradox that the close identification of “Asia” with “technology,” globally as well as within Asia, has not been paralleled by a strong research program in the humanities and social sciences to understand this relationship, particularly its cultural ramifications. It outlines reasons for this, particularly in regard to teaching and research in the history of technology, and suggests that the recent rise of interest in STS in Asia represents a path forward.
Research Article|June 01 2012
Dangerous, Disruptive, or Irrelevant? History (of Technology) as an Acquired Taste in AsiaDangerous, Disruptive, or Irrelevant?G. Clancey
- Views Icon Views
Gregory Clancey; Dangerous, Disruptive, or Irrelevant? History (of Technology) as an Acquired Taste in AsiaDangerous, Disruptive, or Irrelevant?G. Clancey. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1 June 2012; 6 (2): 243–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-1626046
Download citation file:
- Share Icon Share