When Professor Ruey-Lin Chen invited me to respond to an article that he had written partly as a criticism of a few paragraphs in my 2002 article (Lei 2002), I felt both honored and hesitant. I felt hesitant because, in my humble opinion, Professor Chen stretches way too much the three noncentral paragraphs in my original article, one of them only a footnote, into what he characterizes as “skeptical discourses on the constructive function of philosophical debates.” I feel uncomfortable about using the valuable space of EASTS as a forum to clarify a noncentral point of my essay. On the other hand, I feel honored because Professor Chen has made such effective use of this misinterpretation and has turned it into a tool to call for a wide-ranging reform of Taiwanese philosophy of science. Rather than explaining and rectifying the unfortunate...

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview
You do not currently have access to this content.