This article argues that Dogville, a film by the polemical Danish director Lars von Trier (2003), has a great deal to say on the themes of freedom and of the ambiguity of oppression. This discussion of the film’s philosophical grounding brings several defining ideas of existentialist thought into play, particularly as they are fleshed out in Simone de Beauvoir’s treatment of oppression and its counterpart, freedom. Reading Dogville through Beauvoir’s eyes, it appears that oppression, being ambiguous, cannot be defeated by means that are not themselves oppressive. In denying the freedom of the other, the oppressor renders his or her own freedom illusory and therefore unworthy of respect. It is only through the punishment of oppression, paradoxically, that free agency is restored to the oppressor; only through the abolition of oppression are both victim and oppressor set free.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| November 01 2015
Dogville; Or, on Ambiguity and Oppression: A Beauvoirian Reading
Sara Cohen Shabot
Sara Cohen Shabot
sara cohen shabot is a lecturer in women’s and gender studies at the University of Haifa. She specializes in phenomenology, feminist philosophy, and philosophies of the body. Her present research and recent publications address phenomenological perspectives (mainly Beauvoirian) on the maternal embodied subject.
Search for other works by this author on:
differences (2015) 26 (3): 142–164.
Sara Cohen Shabot; Dogville; Or, on Ambiguity and Oppression: A Beauvoirian Reading. differences 1 November 2015; 26 (3): 142–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-3340408
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
1 Web of Science