Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
1-20 of 1017 Search Results for
Union status
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Image
Published: 22 February 2018
Fig. 1 Union status by years since cohabiting union formation: SIPP 1996, 2001, 2004, 2008 panels
More
Image
Published: 29 January 2015
Fig. 1 Union status differences in baseline wealth and wealth trajectories (in thousands) for women with a nonmarital birth ( N = 1,131), NLSY79. An * indicates that the net worth value is significantly different (at p < .05 or better) from either the baseline or over-time value
More
Image
Published: 26 March 2015
Fig. 1 Percentage of first births by union status of the mother (married, cohabiting, single) and percentage of first births within cohabitation versus marriage (dependent variable) across Norwegian municipalities, 1988–2011. Percentages are calculated using the number of inhabitants
More
Image
in Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or Pattern of Disadvantage?
> Demography
Published: 11 January 2011
Image
in Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or Pattern of Disadvantage?
> Demography
Published: 11 January 2011
Fig. 3 Predicted first birth hazards by union status and level of education, adjusted for age (estimated at age 22): Women aged 15–49. Data are from the Russian GGS
More
Image
in Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or Pattern of Disadvantage?
> Demography
Published: 11 January 2011
Fig. 5 Predicted probabilities of union status at first birth for women aged 15–49 single and cohabiting at conception, by education (estimated at age 22, 1996–1999). Data are from the Russian GGS
More
Image
in Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or Pattern of Disadvantage?
> Demography
Published: 11 January 2011
Fig. 6 Distribution of childless women aged 15–49 by union status in December of each year. Data are from the Russian GGS
More
Journal Article
Demography (2019) 56 (5): 1791–1825.
Published: 19 September 2019
... of longitudinal data to test these possibilities. Second, the relationship between union status and health may vary by race/ethnicity (Gorman et al. 2015 ; Hsieh and Ruther 2016 ; Reczek et al. 2017 ). Because of small sample sizes for sexual minorities across different union statuses, we were unable...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Article
Demography (2004) 41 (3): 465–482.
Published: 01 August 2004
... to face separation or divorce than women in other HIV-status couples. These results highlight women’s vulnerability to the social impact of HIV infection and the importance of dyadic studies of the disruption of unions. 14 1 2011 © Population Association of America 2004 2004 Union...
Image
Published: 25 November 2015
Fig. 1 Estimated adjusted aggressive behavior score at school entry by union status and sibship complexity (Table 4 , Model 6), ECLS-B (with 95 % CI). All covariates are held at their respective means
More
Journal Article
Demography (1991) 28 (4): 571–586.
Published: 01 November 1991
...Jay D. Teachman; Jeffrey Thomas; Kathleen Paasch Abstract Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972, we examine the effect of the legal status of coresidential unions on the likelihood of dissolution. We find that legal unions are much more stable than...
Journal Article
Demography (2019) 56 (5): 1875–1897.
Published: 16 August 2019
... recognizes the relative durability or instability of particular family structure statuses. For example, research in this area has documented that marriage is a more enduring union status than cohabitation or being unpartnered. Importantly, research in this area has demonstrated the salience of both...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Article
Demography (2019) 56 (6): 2063–2082.
Published: 11 November 2019
... who separate/divorce across maternal birth cohorts (1940s to 1950s, 1950s to 1960s, 1960s to 1970s), identifying how much of the change can be attributed to shifts in union status at first birth and how much is due to change in separation rates for each union type. We find that when cohabiting births...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Demography (2011) 48 (1): 317–342.
Published: 11 January 2011
...Fig. 1 Percentage first births by union status and period: Women aged 15–49 ...
FIGURES
| View All (6)
Journal Article
Demography (2020) 57 (2): 779–797.
Published: 24 March 2020
... applicable to a broad range of demographic subjects, including marital/union status, political affiliation, residential status, and labor force status. Here, an application is provided to the important but understudied topic of poverty status. Census data, separately for men and women, provide age-specific...
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Article
Demography (2016) 53 (1): 1–26.
Published: 25 November 2015
...Fig. 1 Estimated adjusted aggressive behavior score at school entry by union status and sibship complexity (Table 4 , Model 6), ECLS-B (with 95 % CI). All covariates are held at their respective means ...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Demography (2018) 55 (2): 535–557.
Published: 22 February 2018
...Fig. 1 Union status by years since cohabiting union formation: SIPP 1996, 2001, 2004, 2008 panels ...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Article
Demography (2024) 61 (5): 1267–1282.
Published: 01 October 2024
... populations on a range of sociodemographic (e.g., sexual identity, race and ethnicity), socioeconomic (e.g., education, homeownership), family (e.g., union status), and health (e.g., number of poor mental health days) characteristics. Results reveal that gender minorities are younger than cisgender men...
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Article
Demography (2008) 45 (4): 803–816.
Published: 01 November 2008
... of urbanization itself is strong, evident, and complex, and persists after we control for the effects of age, cohort, union status, and education. Our discrete-time event-history analysis shows that urban women exhibit fertility rates that are, on average, 11% lower than those of rural women, but the effects vary...
Image
in Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or Pattern of Disadvantage?
> Demography
Published: 11 January 2011
Fig. 4 Predicted percentage of single and cohabiting conceptions that result in each union status at birth (estimated at age 22, secondary degree): Women aged 15–49. Data are from the Russian GGS
More
1
