1-20 of 2217 Search Results for

Live Birth

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 October 2023
Fig. 1 Percentage of pregnancies that resulted in live birth that were unintended, by state, 2012–2018. Map was created from author's own analysis of PRAMS data, using mapchart.net . Data are weighted to account for deliberate survey oversampling. Weighted sample is representative of the PRAMS More
Image
Published: 01 October 2023
Fig. 2 Predicted probability of an unintended pregnancy that results in live birth, by state-level abortion policy hostility index level. Predicted probabilities and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are calculated at each level of the state-level abortion policy hostility index (which More
Image
Published: 01 October 2023
Fig. 3 Predicted probability of an unintended pregnancy that results in live birth, by state-level abortion policy hostility index level, according to sociodemographic strata. Predicted probabilities and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are calculated at each level of the state-level More
Image
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 3 Monthly crude live birth rate (births per 1,000 inhabitants in 2010): Recife versus synthetic Recife, ln scale (panel a); and monthly difference-in-differences, live birth cohorts, Pernambuco versus non-Northeast microregions, ln scale (panel b). In panel a, differences in gray More
Image
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 4 Trimester moving-average difference-in-differences, live birth cohorts, Pernambuco versus non-Northeast microregions, ln scale (panel a); and deliveries in public health system, Pernambuco versus non-Northeast microregions, ln scale (panel b). Reported 95% confidence intervals are based More
Image
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 5 Difference in differences, live birth cohorts, Pernambuco versus non-Northeast microregions, by maternal level of education: completed primary or more (panel a), incomplete primary or less (panel b), and triple-differences more- versus less-educated (panel c). See the notes for Fig. 4 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 6 Difference-in-differences, live birth cohorts, Pernambuco versus non-Northeast microregions, by maternal age group: under 25 (panel a), 25–29 (panel b), 30–34 (panel c), and 35+ (panel d). See the notes for Fig. 4 . More
Image
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 7 Difference-in-differences, live birth cohorts, northeast versus non-Northeast microregions, by type LIRAa index red flag: high mosquito infestation (panel a), low/unknown mosquito infestation (panel b), and difference between the two (panel c). See the notes for Fig. 4 . More
Image
Published: 15 July 2014
Fig. 1 Simulation inputs: Divorce and live birth probabilities. Graphical representations of parameter values referenced in Table  2 More
Journal Article
Demography (1979) 16 (4): 575–601.
Published: 01 November 1979
...John McDonald Abstract The relationship between classical demographic deterministic forecasting models, stochastic structural econometric models and time series models is discussed. Final equation autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models for Australian total live-births are constructed...
Journal Article
Demography (2020) 57 (3): 843–872.
Published: 12 May 2020
... of ZIKV-related congenital syndrome poses a threat to reproductive outcomes that could result in declining numbers of live births and potentially fertility. Using monthly microdata on live births from the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC), this study examines live births and fertility...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Article
Demography (1968) 5 (1): 374–381.
Published: 01 March 1968
... . International Journal of Fertility , VII , 175 – 84 . 7 Thompson , W. S. , & Lewis , D. T. ( 1965 ). Population Problems (pp. 131 – 131 ). 5th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Book Company . 8 Che-Fu Lee, An Analysis of the Sex Ratio of Live Births in the United States, 1942–1963...
Image
Published: 26 August 2015
Fig. 2 Electrification rate (%) and fertility (average number of live births per woman aged 15–49) over time, Indonesia. Source: SUSENAS household surveys More
Image
Published: 12 May 2020
Fig. 1 Live births and year percentage change by month: Brazil, 2014–2016 More
Image
Published: 12 May 2020
Fig. 3 Live births and yearly percentage change by month and mother’s education: Brazil, 2014–2016 More
Image
Published: 12 May 2020
Fig. 5 Live births and year percentage change by month: Selected states of Brazil, 2014–2016 More
Image
Published: 12 May 2020
Fig. 6 Live births and yearly percentage change by mother’s education and month: Selected states of Brazil, 2014–2016 More
Journal Article
Demography (1993) 30 (2): 175–188.
Published: 01 May 1993
...Tom Fricke; Jay D. Teachman Abstract Using data from a Nepali population, this analysis argues that marriage style and postmarital living arrangements affect coital frequency to produce variations in the timing of first birth after marriage. Event history analysis of the first birth interval...
Image
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 1 Reported microcephaly cases per 10,000 live births, Brazil aggregate rates for 2006–2017 (panel a), and monthly rates by microregion for 2014–2017 (panel b). For the spatial distribution of these microregions, see Figs. A1 and A2 in the online appendix. See the definition of microregions More
Image
Published: 19 July 2019
Fig. 1 Stillbirths per 1,000 live births, by month. Sweden, 1914–1925. The shaded vertical bars represents the period October–December 1918. Source: Sveriges Officiella Statistik: Befolkningsrörelsen 1914–1925. More